Search for: "Supreme Court of Texas"
Results 361 - 380
of 25,494
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
Wade (Sara Chernikoff, USA Today) The Shameless Oral Arguments in the Supreme Court’s Abortion-Pill Case (Amy Davidson Sorkin, The New Yorker) A controversial Supreme Court decision could hurt Biden in November (John Blake, CNN) Supreme Court’s Texas Order Highlights Abuse of Dubious Shortcut (Will Havemann, Bloomberg Law) The Supreme Court Got It Wrong: Abortion Is Not Settled Law (Melissa Murray… [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 4:53 am
The state can now seek a review with the Supreme Court itself. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 4:10 am
See those decisions for the history of how the Supreme Court got to where it is. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 12:42 pm
That, too, of course, might be reviewed by the en banc Fifth Circuit or by the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:29 am
Texas appealed the preliminary injunction to the US Supreme Court, which then placed a temporary hold on the law. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:08 am
The post “Supreme Court’s Texas Order Highlights Abuse of Dubious Shortcut” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Then-ABA President and future Supreme Court Justice Lewis Powell warned almost 60 years ago: "it is essential that the basic policy of avoiding political involvement be strictly followed except where issues clearly involve the Association's primary responsibilities," arguing that delving into partisan politics "could jeopardize the Association's very existence. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
And as long as the Supreme Court rules in CFPB v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 8:22 pm
The Supreme Court, in an earlier order, stayed the effect of all of the lower court decisions pending the outcome of the Supreme Court’s review of the case. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:35 pm
(This is unusual at the Supreme Court, where in recent years women argued less than a quarter of the cases before the justices.) [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:16 pm
Professor Philip Hamburger has posted a response to my critique of his post on the social media free speech cases currently before the Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:12 pm
The case began in November 2022, when several individual doctors and groups made up of doctors opposed to abortion went to federal court in Texas. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 11:46 am
., the Texas Supreme Court held that disclaiming insurers were not bound by any underlying settlement agreement, entered into without the insurers’ consent, where the claimants promised not to pursue the insured’s non-insurance assets. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 10:53 am
“Porn Industry Seeks Supreme Court Review of Texas Age-Check Law”: Tonya Riley of Bloomberg Law has this report. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 7:17 am
[Live commentary on the Supreme Court oral argument in FDA v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:45 am
The Biden Administration has brought the appeal to the Supreme Court on behalf of the FDA. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 2:42 am
Texas Senate Bill 4 (SB4) and its litigation have been to the Supreme Court and back, possibly changing the dynamic of federal and state relations. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
For L&E-specific podcasts, see: The Metaverse and L&E Podcast (Tim Taylor) Recent Supreme Court Rulings Impacting Labor & Employment Podcast (Tim Taylor) The Court Closes with LGBTQ Rights and Biden Debt Plan Podcast (Law 360) The Supreme Court Guts Affirmative Action Podcast (Law 360) Want the Sabbath Off? [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 9:09 pm
Later that day, a federal appeals court put the controversial law back on hold, just hours after the Supreme Court would have allowed Texas to begin enforcing the new law. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:45 pm
The post “Georgia-Pacific spinoff urges US Supreme Court to skip review of Texas two-step tactic” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
