Search for: "Supreme People's Court Monitor" Results 361 - 380 of 1,042
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2012, 11:55 am by Eric
Apparently, the AG's deal wasn't good enough for the privacy plaintiff's bar (at least, not to their personal fortunes), because 6 years after the settlement--the breach occurred in 2005; the AG settlement in 2006--the Oregon Supreme Court finally kiboshed the class action lawsuit. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 7:08 pm
Put more narrowly, if the cops listen in on your baby monitor, do they violate your "right to privacy," or do you give up your right by knowingly putting the monitor in little Timmy's room in the first place? [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Law Lady
Medicaid Services: SUPREME COURT TO DECIDE IF CALIFORNIA CAN CUT MEDICAID PAYMENTS, Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:29 am
"The Lake County experienceLake County's drug court and one-year-old mental health court, officially known as Therapeutic Intensive Monitoring (TIM) court, provide a good illustration of how specialty courts work. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 7:42 am
To determine whether a special need exists that justifies a suspicionless search, a court must ask whether there is a safety concern that is substantial enough to override the individual's privacy interest and to suppress the Fourth Amendment's requirement of individualized suspicion. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 6:01 pm
Remember video rentals matter because of Robert Bork's encounter with data privacy issues during his nomination for the Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  The second of these decisions, Abbott v Dexcom [2021] EWHC 2246, concerned Abbott's latest application to expedite a patent trial revoking four of Dexcom's patents. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:15 pm by Mary Anne Peck
Supreme Court decisions in the 1980s and 1990s , does not square with many or most peoples understanding of harassment, particularly sexual harassment victims. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
Adkinson, supra.The judge went on to explain that[t]he mission statement of T-Mobile's Loss Prevention program is to `protect people, property and company profitability by utilizing the Loss Prevention teams' knowledge, expertise, and partnerships. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 7:08 am
" "This law says at 2 in the morning, someone can come by and say, ';We're coming into your house now.' In that situation, the Supreme Court has always required there be probable cause and a warrant," he added. * * * The suit names all 92 Indiana county prosecutors, 91 sheriffs and the mayor of Indianapolis as defendants because they would be responsible for carrying out the new law's provisions. * * *… [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:20 am
*For a copy of the Appellate Division’s decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
United States (Arizona's likely appeal to the Supreme Court of United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 8:15 am
The nation's highest court will hear oral arguments in a Kentucky case. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:35 pm
Olson) upheld Congress's creation of the scandal-monitoring Office of Independent Counsel, has the separation-of-powers debate produced a case with more potential significance than in the new test of Congress's more recent response to another scandal. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 11:35 am
Novick, supra.Next, the court noted that acompliance investigator for Kaiser ordered a forensic review of Novick's work computer use. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 11:31 am by Eugene Volokh
In its Complaint, the RNC alleges that it maintains a "list of people who have requested to receive emails from the RNC" and that its campaign emails "are only sent to people on this list. [read post]