Search for: "Supreme Van Lines"
Results 361 - 380
of 658
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
On the (traditional) marriage movement’s own terms, excluding loving couples with children from marriage’s protections was a line that should never have been drawn, much as “Bowers was wrong the day it was decided. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
Van de Kamps Coalition v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
.* JUST OUT - Molecular weights at the Supreme Court - Teva v SandozThe IPKat has already covered the UK litigation of Generics (t/a Mylan) v Yeda/Teva, in which a patent that covered glatiramer acetate was held valid even though the claims specified a particular molecular weight range without specifying what method was used to measure that weight (here, here, and here). [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:24 pm
CRST Van Expedited, Inc., 2012 WL 1583026 (8th Cir. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 10:40 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in thirteen cases during the April sitting. [read post]
24 May 2012, 3:42 am
Boycotts are now much easier to form online and that can hurt a company's bottom line. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 7:16 pm
Other states have contemplated not following the federal edict, which could put them in line to lose grant money. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 7:31 pm
Taking some hard-line actions against high-profile lenders is a great way to generate buzz. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:46 pm
Kristin van Zwieten (D. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:00 pm
CRST Van Expedited, Inc. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 3:27 am
"I am very impressed by the learned line-up and I am very sure special things will happen when so much IP passionate scholars and practisioners fill up the same Singaporean space. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 5:25 am
See, “A bipartisan solution to stopping drive-by lawsuits” ** There is an excellent survey of the law on standing in an ADA context in the recent decision Van Winkle v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 8:14 am
Supreme Court decided two Decalogue cases in 2005, allowing the monument in one, Van Orden v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:15 pm
Brooks, 523 So.2d 1126 (Fla. 1988), the Florida Supreme Court receded from a long line of cases when it held that the doctrine of interspousal tort immunity is abrogated to the extent of liability insurance where traditional policy considerations for maintaining the doctrine do not exist. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am
” Burnham and Gorokhov’s legal blog offers a post suggesting that Van Buren v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:27 am
Pompey Industry v ECU-Line N.V. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
” Indeed, in recent years the Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized the multiple benefits of registration to a trademark claimant, including in the recent cases of Matal v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 1:18 pm
On February 27, the Supreme Court will hear argument in Dubin v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 5:02 pm
Two decades later, Mike was homeless and living in a van. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 11:19 am
[i] Bottom line, tort law requires that we take responsibility for our own actions and the hazards we create. [read post]
