Search for: "Supreme Van Lines"
Results 361 - 380
of 659
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
.* JUST OUT - Molecular weights at the Supreme Court - Teva v SandozThe IPKat has already covered the UK litigation of Generics (t/a Mylan) v Yeda/Teva, in which a patent that covered glatiramer acetate was held valid even though the claims specified a particular molecular weight range without specifying what method was used to measure that weight (here, here, and here). [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
Brendan Van Alsenoy and Marieke Koekkoek, SSRN. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:47 am
This Essay explores six such divergences and how they illuminate of some the most important, unanswered questions of the statutory era.Rules Against Rulification (Michael Coenen)The Supreme Court often confronts the choice between bright-line rules and open-ended standards—a point well understood by commentators and the Court itself. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 12:24 pm
(Bill O’Leary/The Washington Post) This is the question the Supreme Court is facing Monday in Reed v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
Van Breda, 2012 SCC 17. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
April 29, 2014 Van Antwerpen, J.), has been touted as the Third Circuit Court of Appeal’s most important decisions on the exercise of federal jurisdiction in insurance coverage declaratory actions in recent times. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 2:16 am
The subject-line? [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 4:59 am
We have a seat on the Supreme Court of the United States in which a black man sits in black robes. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
Rather, the Third Circuit Court stated that there is no bright line rule permitting the district courts to automatically abstain from hearing such cases unless there was a total absence of any federal legal question presented. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Rather, the Third Circuit Court stated that there is no bright line rule permitting the district courts to automatically abstain from hearing such cases unless there was a total absence of any federal legal question presented. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:33 pm
The Supreme Court held that this was enough, since the caller was obviously an eyewitness to what she claimed. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 6:19 am
North Carolina – Redrawn Political Lines Create Sparse Choice for VotersAshville Citizen-Times – Mark Barrett | Published: 12/2/2014 Results of this year’s general election have once again fueled concerns about North Carolina’s redistricting process, one in which the General Assembly draws lines for U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:07 am
Van Hook. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:59 am
Accordingly, the Court need not predict at this time whether the Vermont Supreme Court would adopt the learned intermediary doctrine. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:14 pm
The defendant’s car was behind the plaintiff’s van in a line leaving Guildford Mall. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
Supreme Court dismisses appeal in Servier v Apotex. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
In line with this observation, various commenters have endorsed some sort of presumption of compliance in the context of Charter interpretation. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
Id. at 790-91.Similarly, California Supreme Court applied a “reasonableness” standard to the computation of out-of pocket damages, concluding that the face-value of medical bills – never actually paid – are not ipso facto“reasonable. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 10:38 am
Georgia law has also recognized the separate claim of “pre-impact fright,” which occurs, for example, when you are in a car and see another car crossing the double yellow line and heading straight for you head-on. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:51 am
The General Data Protection Regulation will bring the law more into line with technology. [read post]
