Search for: "T-MOBILE, USA, Inc." Results 361 - 380 of 443
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2009, 1:21 pm by John W. Arden
The decision is T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 9:49 am
While some appellate commentators expected the Supreme Court to take the case, many 4th Amendment scholars (and this author) were surprised by the Court's action in granting certiorari in the case of USA Mobility Wireless, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 8:44 pm by Eugene Lee
According to a Wall Street Journal article, "Lawsuits Question After-Hours Demands of Email and Cellphones", two recent lawsuits against employers T-Mobile USA Inc. and CB Richard Ellis Group Inc. involve novel legal claims that hourly workers should be paid for time spent responding during off hours to work messages on company-issued phones. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 7:13 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc. (2009 WL 3525855) involved a French company suing a German corporation and a Polish corporation on a RICO cause of action. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 5:33 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
Murphy Oil USA, Inc. used a Special Master to determine fees since the attorneys were in disagreement. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 5:03 pm
T-Mobile USA, Inc., No. 08-35561, slip op. at 14770  n.1  (9th Cir. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 has reached an agreement with Sunoco Inc. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 5:15 am
(IP Dragon   Europe ACTA: Initial discussion on enforcement in the ditigal environment on EU expert level (Blog@IPJUR.com) Is ANDROID descriptive of computers and mobile devices? [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 4:15 am
(IP Dragon Europe ACTA: Initial discussion on enforcement in the ditigal environment on EU expert level (Blog@IPJUR.com) Is ANDROID descriptive of computers and mobile devices? [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 4:15 am
(IP Dragon Europe ACTA: Initial discussion on enforcement in the ditigal environment on EU expert level (Blog@IPJUR.com) Is ANDROID descriptive of computers and mobile devices? [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 2:35 pm
Virgin Mobile USA, L.P., 2009 WL 3075205 (N.D. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 7:00 am by Russell Cawyer
  For example,T-Mobile USA Inc. was sued in July 2009 by three current and former employees for unpaid working time claiming they were required to use their T-Mobile issued phones to read and respond to message outside of working hours. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Holliston, MA; Lawrence Sloane, President) B&T Fire Sprinkler Inc. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 6:12 am
The lawsuit was brought as a nationwide, opt-in collective action consisting of all persons who are or were employed by T-Mobile USA Inc. from July 10, 2006, to date as retail sales associates and supervisors. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 7:42 am
T-Mobile USA Inc., the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that two former sales employees, who had accepted Offers of Judgment, lacked standing to appeal a lower federal court’s decision to deny class certification to all Company hourly employees because they failed to retain a personal stake in the litigation and their cases were moot. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
No’ had been broadcast in Member States that affords special protection to film titles: Danjaq v OHIM, Mission Products (Class 46) Jesper Kongstad, Benoît Battistelli enter the fray in battle to be next EPO President (IAM) EPO sets deadline for presidential applications (Managing Intellectual Property) (IAM) The IP ecosystem (Innovationpartners) More work on draft council regulation on the EU community patent (BLOG@IP::JUR) Mr Bruno van Pottelsberghe calling for European… [read post]