Search for: "T. R. T."
Results 361 - 380
of 302,352
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
In the present case the issuance of the order to refuse interlocutory revision before receipt of the statement of grounds deprived the appellant of the possibility of a fore-shortened appeal procedure provided by A 109 and amounts to a substantial procedural violation, see T 41/97 [5]. [4] However, despite the presence of a substantial procedural violation the board considers that it would not be equitable to reimburse the appeal fee under R 103(1)(a). [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
According to R 115 this is not required if “the parties agree to a shorter period”. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 11:01 am
On June 2, 2010, the appellant filed a request to the ED for correction of the decision according to R 140. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:01 am
Packy doesn't sound too keen on raising taxes on... [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Carissa R Trast has published her Note, You Can't Choose Your Parents: Why Children Raised By Same-Sex Couples Are Entitled to Inheritance Rights From Both Their Parents, in 35 Hofstra L. [read post]
2 May 2007, 10:30 am
Interesting op-ed in today's Wall Street Journal: Don't Abolish the AMT, by David R. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
Similarly under EPC 1973 (as in force at the time of filing of the original application and of the replacement figures) this was a formal deficiency under R 32(2)(a) in combination with R 40, which could be remedied upon invitation under R 41. [4.4.3] The second reason given by the [opponent] as to why the colour figures should not form the basis of the comparison required under A 123(2) is based on the argument that no information concerning colour figures is available to… [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
The procedural decision of an OD to disregard submissions forms an essential element of its decision-making process and as such belongs to the issues subject to review when the final decision of the OD is challenged on its merits (T 986/93 [2.4]). [3.5] The OD considered that the moiety -NHC(=O)(CH2)(CH2)phenyl present in compounds 54a, 126, 129 or 130 did not fall within the definition of the residue R**(1) of claim 1 of the patent in suit, because the term “amino” was… [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 5:48 pm
Now, the Société de Législation Comparée is organizing a conference in Paris on March 15, to discuss the consequences from the decision. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
J 19/90 [3.1.1], T 445/98 [3.2.1], T 778/00 [3.2.4], T 275/86 [3.3.1]). [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 11:40 am
Further, if the mandatory “R” rating for tobacco imagery is adopted, doesn’t it follow that there should be a mandatory “R” rating for depictions of underage drinking, or of overeating, or anything else that may cause physical harm to children? [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:14 am
” Though she didn’t write it, Wynette lived the lyrics of “D-I-V-O-R-C-E,” having been... [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 2:52 pm
"Mukasey won't pursue charges in Justice Department hiring scandal; The abuses that took place under Alberto R. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
Consequently, neither the ED nor the Board are able to order under R 103(1)(a) the reimbursement of the appeal fee of an appeal that has been fully allowed by the first-instance department and therefore closed before the appellant requested for the first time the reimbursement of the corresponding appeal fee (see in this respect decisions T 21/02 [3-8] and T 242/05 [1-2]). [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:01 pm
This is because such statements are not “relevant” to the decision which the Board has to take, within the meaning of R 124(1). [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 11:58 pm
The Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel is seeking to hire a Professor of Public Law with a focus on Public International Law and European Union Law and as one of the directors of the Walther-Schücking-Institut für Internationales Recht. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
Gleiches gilt für die Angabe "1 mµ". [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
[Opponents 2 to 4] relied on the decisions T 1067/08 and T 23/10 refusing late filed claim requests pursuant to Article 12(4) RPBA. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
T 1170/05). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm
The right to be heard in OPs subsists so long as proceedings are pending before the EPO (T 556/95 [4.4], T 598/88 [3]). [read post]
