Search for: "TAYLOR v. STATE" Results 361 - 380 of 3,309
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2022, 11:46 am by John Elwood
Dennis noted that the Supreme Court had only recently in Taylor v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
  And a final example is provided by Article V of the United States Constitution. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In Matter of Blackburne, 211 AD2d 13, [motion to appeal denied, 86 N.Y.2d 705], the Appellate Division opined that an individual otherwise entitled to an "administrative due process disciplinary hearing” such as one provided by a Taylor Law collective bargaining agreement [CBA] or by state law, may be summarily removed from his or her position under certain conditions. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In Matter of Blackburne, 211 AD2d 13, [motion to appeal denied, 86 N.Y.2d 705], the Appellate Division opined that an individual otherwise entitled to an "administrative due process disciplinary hearing” such as one provided by a Taylor Law collective bargaining agreement [CBA] or by state law, may be summarily removed from his or her position under certain conditions. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Xu was indicted for committing the crime of subverting state power on 5 August 2021. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 11:54 am by crimdefense@hotmail.com
People v Burton, 252 Mich App 130, 141, 143-144; 651 NW2d 143 (2002). [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 8:10 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
British Columbia, 2021 BCSC 248 (“Beaudoin”); and the decision of Burrage J. in Taylor v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:22 am by Oscar Davies and Jack Castle
In R (on the application of Elan-Cane) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 56, [2021] All ER (D) 53 (Dec), the Supreme Court found there was no positive obligation on the state to provide the option of an ‘X’ gender category on passports. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 28 February 2022, the claimant’s case was dismissed in Taylor v Nationwide News Pty Limited (No 2) [2022] FCA 149. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 9:27 pm by Unknown
§ 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(1) (emphasis added); see also Taylor Made Software, Inc. v. [read post]