Search for: "THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF OKLAHOMA, by and through its Judges"
Results 361 - 380
of 490
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2013, 9:48 am
Perhaps the Kraffts will ask the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to review. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in National Australia Bank v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm
King in state court, and filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 4:46 am
It's a delicate balance that is never perfected. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 9:09 am
Jess Bravin, the Supreme Court correspondent for the Wall Street Journal, has this adapted excerpt from his forthcoming book, The Terror Courts: Rough Justice at Guantanamo Bay, in The Atlantic. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 11:15 am
The Court is expected to use the case to clarify the right of a state to claim its share of a water rights compact from the waters of the shared river as it flows through a neighboring state. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
The Indiana Supreme Court rejected one of its century-old decisions and held that filing a lawsuit to enforce a non-compete agreement does not violate the state’s blacklisting statute. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
The Indiana Supreme Court rejected one of its century-old decisions and held that filing a lawsuit to enforce a non-compete agreement does not violate the state’s blacklisting statute. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 9:53 am
And in the year's most talked-about non-compete case, the Supreme Court of the United States reversed a decision of the Oklahoma Supreme Court and held that an arbitrator, not a state court, must determine the enforceability of a non-compete agreement if the underlying contract contains an arbitration clause. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 11:13 am
The Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the trial court, reversing the Court of Appeal. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 7:39 am
In particular, in Burson, the Supreme Court recognized two separate compelling interests that support restrictions on electioneering near polling places: first, “a State has a compelling interest in protecting voters from confusion and undue influence”; and second, “a State indisputably has a compelling interest in preserving the integrity of its election process. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am
In theory, one political party could prevent the election of a president by boycotting the House vote, but that strategy would work only if the boycotting party included in its ranks the entire Congressional delegations of 17 states. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am
(Given that Judges Stephen Reinhardt and Betty Fletcher rejected his remaining claims, I do not anticipate the Supreme Court granting him further relief.) [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:04 am
MEMO: A Report on Obama Administration Violations of Law FROM: Attorneys General Tom Horne, Arizona; Pam Bondi, Florida; Sam Olens, Georgia; Bill Schuette, Michigan; Scott Pruitt, Oklahoma; Marty Jackley, South Dakota; Alan Wilson, South Carolina; Greg Abbott, Texas; Ken Cuccinelli, Virginia DATE: March… [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 1:16 pm
The task force of prosecutors, defense attorneys, judges, and death penalty experts convened by Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice Maureen O'Connor is looking at a variety of issues including how the law affects minorities, the role of clemency, and whether death sentences in the state are proportional. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:10 pm
Brandenbug, as I mentioned in my earlier post, is the United States Supreme Court case that articulates the relevant standard: speech may only be banned on the theory that it is incitement when it is intended to create, and likely to create, a clear and present danger of imminent lawless action. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 8:08 am
None of the six has ever adopted market share liability in any context (the Oklahoma Supreme Court expressly rejected it in a DES case), so product identification is not in any sense an open question in any of them.We guess that’s why the MDL court ruled the way it did. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm
The Justice Department did not use its options of slowing down the progress of the cases toward the Supreme Court, indicating that it, too, wanted a prompt decision. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
Sometimes a court – or judges of a court – gives the litigants direction about what arguments are likely to succeed. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:50 pm
In New Jersey, the state recently adopted its own version of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. [read post]
