Search for: "THU L"
Results 361 - 380
of 12,733
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2010, 8:10 pm
” The complaint asserts that the following L&M products infringe the intellectual property of Fine Art Lamps: (a) chandelier with L&M’s product number 18288, (b) chandelier with L&M’s product number 18292, (c) semi-flush mount lamp with L&M’s product number 18290, (d) lantern with L&M’s product number 18296, (e) L&M’s pendant lamp, and (f) lantern with L&M’s product… [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 1:24 pm
The parties thus were no longer adverse to each other on any claims, and the Court of Appeals could not “affect their rights” in any legally cognizable manner. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 1:30 pm
Citizens for the Restoration of L Street v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:13 am
City L. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 3:40 pm
L. 797) on SSRN. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:00 am
Christopher Jon Sprigman, Christopher Buccafusco, & Zachary Burns, Valuing Attribution and Publication in Intellectual Property (Va L. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 7:40 pm
Peter L. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 2:10 pm
Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos (University of Westminster) has posted Law, Space, Bodies: The Emergence of Spatial Justice (DELEUZE AND LAW, L. de Sutter, ed., Edinburgh University Press, 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 4:43 pm
L. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 7:55 pm
EMC Nat’l Life Co., No. 07-0828 (2nd Cir. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:15 am
May 2, 2007) By K&L Gates This is a putative class action in which the plaintiffs allege they were discriminated against because they were not minorities or females. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:16 am
Edward L. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 4:42 am
The court ruled that most of the objections go to the weight of the testimony and not the admissibility and, thus, both motions are denied in their entirety (with limited exceptions). [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:55 pm
L. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 5:11 am
The Relationship Agreement actually works to the advantage of the ICC and thus should help dispel concerns about a competing STCoA. [read post]
20 May 2008, 7:55 am
Thus, if the worker can show that the employer is 1% responsible for his injuries, then the employer is responsible for all the damages. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 8:58 am
Addressing the Pitfalls of Using Choice-Architecture Discourse within Poverty Law, Modern L. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:19 pm
L&H and INSYSMA won the contract. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 1:09 pm
Thus, the jury had to determine whether a hypothetical consumer would likely be confused. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 12:15 am
If this reminds anyone of Chancellor Allen's ruling in In re Caremark Int'l Inc. [read post]
