Search for: "Taking Offense v. California"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,468
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm
v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, November 05, 2008 US v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 8:15 am
California. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:20 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:57 pm
Much less to take the risk.But there you have it. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 2:52 am
Arizona (Phoenix) for the win.US v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:24 am
This post examines a recent decision from the Court of Appeal, Second District Division 4 California: People v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:50 am
U.S. v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 2:28 pm
Tiny burden, big benefit.To be clear: Not the law in California, however. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Gov't of Nashville & Davidson County, No. 07-5180 In a case brought by a police officer alleging that, after an altercation at a bar while he was off duty, he was unlawfully required to take the breathalyzer test in violation of his constitutional rights, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) under a totality-of-the-circumstances analysis, plaintiff was not seized when he submitted to the breathalyzer test, but was only afraid he would be terminated or suspended… [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 7:30 pm
California Department of Justice, 173 Cal. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 5:00 am
In 1956, in Railway Employees Dep’t v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:55 am
The amici argue that when there is a “readily apparent” federal definition of an offense, the Supreme Court will apply it, as it did in in Taylor v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
California: Mr. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 11:37 am
The case, Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:51 pm
California, as applied to Belton. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
Perhaps we want a lesser “plausible” offense, so we punish people less in the presence of scientific complexity. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:17 pm
The proper first step in the analysis, the court said, is to weigh the gravity of the offense and the severity of the sentence—and that step must be completed “without taking subsequent sentencing amendments into account. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 1:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 8:02 am
Defendant goes to jail.United States v. [read post]
