Search for: "Taylor v. Williams"
Results 361 - 380
of 518
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2011, 3:59 am
In Williams v Safir, 696 NY2d 139, Dillion’s theory that Section 891 applies to probationary as well as tenured police officers was specifically rejected; and 2. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 2:17 pm
Landrigan nor Michael Williams v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:50 am
State Supreme Court Judge William McCooe said it was untimely and dismissed Gomez’s petition. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:37 pm
Noncapital United States v Styles Taylor and Keon Thomas, 2011 U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:00 pm
Superior Court, 7 Cal.3d 861 (1972) and Taylor Bus Service, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 3:22 am
Levine’s assumption proved to be incorrect, as the Appellate Division quickly pointed out.Affirming the dismissal of his petition by State Supreme Court William J. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:22 am
Taylor Law considerations concerning General Municipal Law Section 207-a/207-cBarnes v Council 82, [David Monroe], Court of Appeals, 94 NY2d 719Watertown v Watertown PBA, Court of Appeals, 95 NY2d 73Local 2562, IAFF, AFL-CIO, v Cohoes, Court of Appeals, 94 NY2d 686The Court of Appeals has handed down three rulings concerning issues involving collective bargaining under the Taylor Law as they relate to negotiating procedures to implement and administer… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:58 am
”); Williams v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:15 am
The Appellate Division decided that Taylor’s dismissal was improper because Taylor was not terminated for the sole reason specified in the settlement: intoxication on the job. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 1:46 pm
In Terry Williams v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:54 am
In some instances a public employer has negotiated a "no outside employment" provision in the course of collective bargaining under the Taylor Law that provides that approval of outside employment is at the sole discretion of the appointing authority.However, other provisions of law may bar moonlighting involving certain employers.For example, an article in the August 25, 2010 issue of the Buffalo News reported: “Police officers cannot work in a licensed bar, restaurant or… [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:32 am
Judge William Alsup stated the United States Supreme Court 'has not yet made a clear ruling that admission of irrelevant or overtly prejudicial evidence constitutes a due process violation sufficient to warrant issuance of the writ.' Holley v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
William Eugene Thompson v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:56 am
Taylor v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2010] EWHC 2494 (QB), QBD – 11 Oct 2010. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 6:29 am
Goldstock NEW YORK COUNTYLegal Profession Recovery for Emotional Distress In Malpractice Actions Is Denied Taylor v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
Universal Pictures Corporation, 45 F.2d 119, 123 (2d Cir. 1930); Williams v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 2:48 pm
Williams Construction Co. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:57 pm
One could argue that even the choice of twelve as the number of jurors might be sufficiently arbitrary and accidental that some variation would be permitted, see Williams v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:49 pm
Hutin YJF, Pool V, Cramer EH, et al [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 11:22 am
Renée Taylor (MF, H)35. [read post]
