Search for: "Tenant v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 2,685
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2007, 5:25 am
McCooe, expressed his disagreement with his colleagues in a pithy memorandum decision which reads, in substantial part, as follows:A rent-stabilized tenant who moves to another apartment in the same building to become the superintendent reverts to rent-stabilized status when his employment is terminated for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Mohr v Gomez (173 Misc 2d 553 [App Term, 1st Dept 1997, McCooe, J., dissenting]). [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:55 am
However, the Order stated ‘no order as to costs’. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:28 pm
United States, 525 F.3d 1149, 1154 (citing Bennis v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:38 am
LB Brent v Shulem B Association Ltd [2011] EWHC 1663 (Ch) is an appeal from the county court. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:38 am
LB Brent v Shulem B Association Ltd [2011] EWHC 1663 (Ch) is an appeal from the county court. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:22 am
However, Bishop v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 2:04 pm
Another example under LAD of HOAs, boards, and landlords being required to provide reasonable accommodations is found when residents or tenants are need of service dogs to assist with their disabilities. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:05 am
On Monday, June 29, Chief Judge Colleen McMahon, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, issued a 37-page opinion which threw out a lawsuit filed by three landlords who alleged that New York State’s moratorium -- on evicting tenants facing financial hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the directive permitting tenants to have their landlords apply their security deposits to any outstanding rent -- was… [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:05 am
On Monday, June 29, Chief Judge Colleen McMahon, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, issued a 37-page opinion which threw out a lawsuit filed by three landlords who alleged that New York State’s moratorium -- on evicting tenants facing financial hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the directive permitting tenants to have their landlords apply their security deposits to any outstanding rent -- was… [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 8:54 am
And it's state law that determines whether or not a tenant still has a right to the property at that crucial time when the bankruptcy case is filed. . [read post]
11 Oct 2024, 5:11 am
SJB RE Holdings, LLC v Gifford 2024 NY Slip Op 30924(U) March 21, 2024 Supreme Court, Saratoga County Docket Number: Index No. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 4:21 pm
Schmidt v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm
But in MOC (by his litigation friend, MG)-v-Secretary of State [2022] EWCA an Upper Tribunal Judge found that capacity was unsuitable as a key element in identifying a “status” for Article 14 as too “potentially evanescent”. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 2:55 pm
Handyman Connection of Sacramento, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 12:14 pm
In Hodges v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 4:03 am
" Lindsey v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 7:08 am
On June 3, 2021 in The Gap, Inc. v. 170 Broadway Retail Owner, LLC, a New York state appellate panel cast doubts on The Gap’s ability to terminate its lease based on the impossibility doctrine. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am
However, Boldack v East Lindsay DC 31 HLR 41 held that Cavalier v Pope was binding authority unless it could be distinguished.The Claimant sought to argue for a duty of care, relying on Lips v Older [2005] PIQR P14, where a (1/3) duty had been found in respect of a tenant who had fallen off a low retaining wall into a lowered area. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am
However, Boldack v East Lindsay DC 31 HLR 41 held that Cavalier v Pope was binding authority unless it could be distinguished.The Claimant sought to argue for a duty of care, relying on Lips v Older [2005] PIQR P14, where a (1/3) duty had been found in respect of a tenant who had fallen off a low retaining wall into a lowered area. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 3:00 am
See e.g., Badillo v. [read post]
