Search for: "The Active v. United States" Results 361 - 380 of 18,172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2007, 8:06 am
In a decision handed down today, United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 1:28 pm by James Yang
Under Section 271(a), activities considered to be infringing a patent when performed wholly in the United States may be transformed into non-infringing activities if some of those activities are performed outside of the United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 1:28 pm by James Yang
Under Section 271(a), activities considered to be infringing a patent when performed wholly in the United States may be transformed into non-infringing activities if some of those activities are performed outside of the United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 6:09 am
(SCOTUSwiki) At 11 a.m., the Court is scheduled to hear argument in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Justices Breyer, Kavanaugh, Ginsburg and Gorsuch and Chief Justice Roberts were among the most active questioners of Malcolm Stewart, representing the government of the United States, and Morgan Chu of Irell & Manella, representing NantKwest, during yesterday’s oral argument in Peter v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 2:34 am
Defendants seek review of a Court of Appeals decision reversing in part and affirming in part the trial court's judgment.Plaintiffs Oregon Education Association (OEA) and American Federation of Teachers (AFT), and the state, as intervenor, sought and obtained a judgment under the Oregon Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (ORICO), ORS 166.715 to 166.735, against defendants Oregon Taxpayers United Political Action Committee (OTU- PAC) and Oregon Taxpayers… [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:04 pm by The Federalist Society
Sturgeon and Alaska contended that the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) precludes NPS from regulating activities on state-owned lands and navigable waters that fall within the boundaries of National Park System units in Alaska. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Index Newspapers v City of Portland, 3:20-cv-1035-SI, the United States District Court for the District of Oregon has entered a temporary restraining order that blocks federal law enforcement officers from arresting or using physical force against journalists and legal observers as they respond to anti–police brutality protests there. [read post]