Search for: "The Corporation Counsel et al"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,027
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2017, 4:43 am
Montgomery et al., 2016-0790. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Or is the corporation merely property, a complex commodity? [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:56 pm
For details, please see the Forum web page / Twitter @WGBizHRs Invitation aux parties intéressées à proposer des événements parallèlesLe Groupe de travail sur la question des droits de l’homme et des sociétés transnationales et autres entreprises et le Sécretariat du Forum invitent toutes les parties prenantes à proposer des événement parallèles pour le sixième… [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:35 am
Both the DMCA and the 1972 Copyright Act (which the DMCA amended) are federal laws because they emanate from Congress – the safe harbour principle is a creation of federal law.At stake in this case was whether pre-1972 sound recordings are covered under the safe harbour rule, since pre-1972 sound recordings are protected under state law rather than federal law.Capitol Records et al. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:26 pm
However, as counsel for NAB in Morrison has noted, the text of Section 929P states only that federal courts will have jurisdiction to hear certain securities cases involving foreign conduct, something that was never disputed in Morrison.[9] Whether the focus on jurisdiction is merely a drafting error or a conscious decision by Congress remains open to debate. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 3:06 am
Gedney Association, et al v City of White Plains, 2017 WL 600519 (NYAD 2 Dept. 2/15/2017)Filed under: Access to Government, Current Caselaw - New York, Uncategorized [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 9:17 am
But here are some thoughts on how one might parse the main issues that the paper discusses: I won't try to offer a full assessment of the DBCFT here - that would require a very long article.As it happens, many others are writing such articles (including Shay et al). [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:57 pm
Bouaphakeo, et al., and Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 4:50 pm
In a lawsuit brought by Viet Bui and Christina Avalos-Reyes on behalf of themselves and similarly situated employees known as Viet Bui et al. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 6:40 am
Gomez, et al., 136 S. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
Dale Brink, DPM, et al., 2016 IL App (1st) 152674, Sept. 30, 2016. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
Dale Brink, DPM, et al., 2016 IL App (1st) 152674, Sept. 30, 2016. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 7:21 am
" Boston Scientific Corporation et al v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
Rubin et al., an appellate court in Massachusetts affirmed dismissal of plaintiff’s claims, holding that Agero failed to establish that two of the defendants, Timothy Schneider and Matthew Capozzi, owed Agero a duty of loyalty. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
Rubin et al., an appellate court in Massachusetts affirmed dismissal of plaintiff’s claims, holding that Agero failed to establish that two of the defendants, Timothy Schneider and Matthew Capozzi, owed Agero a duty of loyalty. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
Here’s how I summarized the law in the LaFave et al. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 12:44 pm
MacGillivray, supra; Coulter and Ball et al., 2002 BCSC 1740 (CanLII); and s. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 2:55 pm
Flores, et al. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 7:12 am
Sears Holdings Corporation et al, 1-12-cv-09033 (ILND September 20, 2016, Order) (Darrah, USDJ) [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am
However, hope that we can get more consensus by going to empirical claims is probably futile, as Dan Kahan et al have said in many other legal contexts. [read post]
