Search for: "The Delaware Supreme Court"
Results 361 - 380
of 6,540
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court remanded the case for a determination of whether the parties fulfilled that obligation. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:00 am
Affirming the Court of Chancery below, the Delaware Supreme Court held that the right to sue is not a “power” within the meaning of Section 242(b)(2), and, thus, the charter amendment did not require approval by all classes of stock. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 6:13 am
The court emphasized that Delaware courts must analyze all the particularized facts pled by the plaintiffs “in their totality and not in isolation from each other. [read post]
22 May 2007, 7:42 am
The Supreme Court shall have jurisdiction as follows: ...(8) To hear and determine questions of law certified to it by other Delaware courts, the Supreme Court of the United States, a Court of Appeals of the United States, a United States District Court, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or the highest appellate court of any other state, where it appears to the Supreme Court… [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 6:00 pm
“Delaware Supreme Court Justice James Vaughn announces retirement”: Paul Kiefer of Delaware Public Media has this report. [read post]
27 May 2017, 7:38 pm
Supreme Court decision. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:00 am
., No. 565, 2016 (December 14, 2017) In this much-anticipated decision, the Delaware Supreme Court stresses the importance of the deal price to the award in an appraisal case. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 4:33 am
Yesterday, as noted in this article, the Delaware Senate unanimously confirmed Andre Bouchard as Chancellor of Delaware’s Court of Chancery, replacing Leo Strine who became Chief Justice for Delaware’s Supreme Court… [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 7:27 pm
Justice Jacobs wrote the opinion for the full Delaware Supreme Court.A change in the Delaware Constitution allows the SEC to certify questions to the Court. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
In a case with implications for companies with controlling stockholders, the Delaware Supreme Court held that the MWF Doctrine applies to any transaction involving a controlling shareholder receiving a non-ratable benefit, and both MFW cleansing mechanisms must be satisfied for business judgment review, rather than entire fairness, to apply to such transactions. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
In a case with implications for companies with controlling stockholders, the Delaware Supreme Court held that the MWF Doctrine applies to any transaction involving a controlling shareholder receiving a non-ratable benefit, and both MFW cleansing mechanisms must be satisfied for business judgment review, rather than entire fairness, to apply to such transactions. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
In a case with implications for companies with controlling stockholders, the Delaware Supreme Court held that the MWF Doctrine applies to any transaction involving a controlling shareholder receiving a non-ratable benefit, and both MFW cleansing mechanisms must be satisfied for business judgment review, rather than entire fairness, to apply to such transactions. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
In a case with implications for companies with controlling stockholders, the Delaware Supreme Court held that the MWF Doctrine applies to any transaction involving a controlling shareholder receiving a non-ratable benefit, and both MFW cleansing mechanisms must be satisfied for business judgment review, rather than entire fairness, to apply to such transactions. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
In a case with implications for companies with controlling stockholders, the Delaware Supreme Court held that the MWF Doctrine applies to any transaction involving a controlling shareholder receiving a non-ratable benefit, and both MFW cleansing mechanisms must be satisfied for business judgment review, rather than entire fairness, to apply to such transactions. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
In a case with implications for companies with controlling stockholders, the Delaware Supreme Court held that the MWF Doctrine applies to any transaction involving a controlling shareholder receiving a non-ratable benefit, and both MFW cleansing mechanisms must be satisfied for business judgment review, rather than entire fairness, to apply to such transactions. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 6:00 am
But, the Delaware Supreme Court has concluded that when drafters do so, the drafters should be explicit in whether they also intend to incorporate judicial interpretations of that language, too. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
The Delaware Supreme Court reversed. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 8:15 am
” The recent Delaware Supreme Court decision that the statute is unconstitutional confirms that Delaware doesn’t “do it right. [read post]
Delaware Supreme Court Explains Delaware’s Intermediate Forum Non Conveniens Standard Under Gramercy
9 Jul 2021, 6:00 am
May, 20, 2021)Delaware has three standards for forum non conveniens motions. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 11:16 am
Ch. 2008) – a case I worked on as a judicial clerk – the court wrote, “[m]any commentators have noted that Delaware courts have never found a... [read post]
