Search for: "The People v. English" Results 361 - 380 of 2,885
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
While it was apparent that English was not appellant's native language, Officer McComb spoke to him in English, and appellant appeared to understand. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
Ct. 1615, 1619 (2021) (Sotomayor, J.); Barton v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 12:09 pm by Glotzer & Sweat
 Today, I discuss the seminal California Supreme Court premises liability case of Rowland v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 11:13 am by Jon Ibanez
However, the California Court of Appeals in People v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:15 am by Patricia Hughes
In other words, it is not the state that is the nation (“Quebec is a nation”), but the people. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 8:02 am by David Cheifetz
The UK QB ruled unanimously (3-0) this fine English morning that the Tory gov’t cannot use the Crown’s prerogative to initiate the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
The Court confirmed that the trial judge was correct to hold that such allegations would tend to have a substantial adverse effect (Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Limited [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) [98]) on the way that people would treat Mr Millet. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:44 am by Christine Hurt
I have a few thoughts about Chancellor Chandler's opinion in eBay v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
This is an important development, not least because the McInerney Homeshurdle is a high one (see, eg, SZ (Pakistan) v Minister for Justice [2013] IEHC 95 (01 March 2013); Nee v An Bord Pleanala [2013] IEHC 584 (29 October 2013); Kilarden Investments Ltd v Kirwans (Galway) Ltd [2013] IEHC 602 (01 November 2013); Rughoonauth v Minister for Justice [2017] IEHC 241 (24 April… [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am by INFORRM
It also reflects the growing influence of Strasbourg jurisprudence on English defamation law. [read post]