Search for: "The Southwark"
Results 361 - 380
of 471
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
It effectively raised the issue of oppression: The body of law upon which the argument is founded includes those cases raising the issue of "oppression": see, for example, Southwark L.B.C. v Sarfo (2000) 32 HLR 602 (where Roch LJ said, at 609, that "oppression may be very difficult if not impossible to define, but it is not difficult to recognise"); London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
It effectively raised the issue of oppression: The body of law upon which the argument is founded includes those cases raising the issue of "oppression": see, for example, Southwark L.B.C. v Sarfo (2000) 32 HLR 602 (where Roch LJ said, at 609, that "oppression may be very difficult if not impossible to define, but it is not difficult to recognise"); London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:03 am
Austin v Southwark London Borough Council [2010] UKSC 28; [2010] WLR (D) 156 “The right of a ‘tolerated trespasser’, a person continuing to occupy his rented home following a breach of the terms of a conditional suspended possession order, to apply to the court for postponement of the date for possession to enable him to remedy the default and revive the secure tenancy, under s 85(2) of the Housing Act 1985, survived his death and could, consequently, be exercised by his… [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 11:02 am
[Fagan's] lover, Finola McKenna, who was also naked, glassed the lawyer in the face when he tried to force her to use a ‘medieval torture instrument’ during a kinky sex session, Southwark Crown Court heard yesterday. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:14 am
Supreme Court JR17 for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) [2010] UKSC 27 (23 June 2010) Austin v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark [2010] UKSC 28 (23 June 2010) Secretary of State for the Home Department v AP (No. 2) [2010] UKSC 26 (23 June 2010) Source: www.bailii.org.uk [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:54 am
The Southwark Crown Court found he stole the Nouvelle Iconographies des Camellias from the Royal Horticultural Society’s library in central London. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
In September 2006 Southwark served Notice to Quit on Barry Austin and then began possession proceedings in January 2007. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
In September 2006 Southwark served Notice to Quit on Barry Austin and then began possession proceedings in January 2007. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 11:00 pm
This will not be the end of the affair, however, as leave to appeal has been granted with the case to be heard by the Court of Appeal as early as before the end of this month Mr Justice Saunders sitting the Southwark Crown Court ruled that the parliamentary privilege enshrined in the 1688 Bill of Rights does not extend to protecting the four ex-MPs, Elliott Morley, David Chaytor, James Devine and Lord Hanningfield, from prosecutions for claiming inflated expenses. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 2:07 am
Mr Justice Wyn Williams referred to the well known case of Anufrijeva v London Borough of Southwark for the relevant principles on appropriate remedies under the Human Rights Act. [read post]
31 May 2010, 11:02 pm
Andrew Rimmington, 40, who is accused of making a £40,000 profit buying shares in NeuTec Pharma after a tip-off from another lawyer, was discharged at Southwark Crown Court. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:58 am
Homelessness O'Callaghan v Southwark LBC. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:58 am
Homelessness O'Callaghan v Southwark LBC. [read post]
10 May 2010, 9:58 pm
MacDuff J in Morris v London Borough of Southwark [2010] EWHC B1 (QB) held that such an agreement might be unlawful but the particular one he was considering was lawful. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:21 pm
However, the key issue was whether the YOT social worker was exercising a social services function in this apparent assessment of TG as a 'child in need', thus making the referral to the HPU akin to the position in R (G) v Southwark LBC [2009] 1 WLR 1299 (our report here), or not, in which case the situation would be akin to R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2008] 1 WLR 535 (our report here). [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:21 pm
However, the key issue was whether the YOT social worker was exercising a social services function in this apparent assessment of TG as a 'child in need', thus making the referral to the HPU akin to the position in R (G) v Southwark LBC [2009] 1 WLR 1299 (our report here), or not, in which case the situation would be akin to R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2008] 1 WLR 535 (our report here). [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
Austin v Southwark LBC is being heard in the Supreme Court tomorrow - Wednesday 21 April - and Thursday, for starters), I thought we might take a look at the main parties' manifesto commitments on housing and housing law related issues. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
Austin v Southwark LBC is being heard in the Supreme Court tomorrow - Wednesday 21 April - and Thursday, for starters), I thought we might take a look at the main parties' manifesto commitments on housing and housing law related issues. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 1:45 pm
The guidance is, mostly, explaining and endorsing the effect of R (G) v LB Southwark [2009] UKHL 26 (see our note here). [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 1:45 pm
The guidance is, mostly, explaining and endorsing the effect of R (G) v LB Southwark [2009] UKHL 26 (see our note here). [read post]
