Search for: "Thomas v. Given"
Results 361 - 380
of 5,077
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2023, 11:02 am
During capital sentencing proceedings, Leavell-Keaton was given the opportunity to present mitigating evidence, and then she was supposed to be given an opportunity to make a statement on her own behalf before being sentenced. [read post]
24 May 2023, 5:06 am
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
The Press Gazette has summarised the evidence given by Scobie and Johnson. [read post]
22 May 2023, 9:22 am
Thomas, 547 U. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:16 am
The most onerous sentences so far have been those meted out to former New York police officer Thomas Webster and welder Peter Schwartz—10 years and just over 14 years (170 months), respectively. [read post]
19 May 2023, 2:30 pm
Taamneh and a companion case, Gonzalez v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 8:54 am
The Supreme Court’s big case on Section 230, Gonzalez v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 5:01 am
Thomas (MN) has a wonderful article about the oddness of the Ninth Amendment. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:00 am
(Even Justice Thomas thinks the Constitution limits state protectionist laws, but he would locate protection in the Import/Export Clause of Article I, Sec. 10 and the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV, Sec. 2).In addition, pursuant to Pike v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Last week, in National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 1:21 pm
Twitter, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:01 am
More on that in Part V tomorrow, plus some big picture thoughts. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:32 am
And in future cases, Justice Clarence Thomas emphasized, courts should uphold gun restrictions only if there is a tradition of such regulation in United States history. [read post]
16 May 2023, 9:05 pm
Indeed, in only one Delaware case, Akorn v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:53 am
But given this lineup, what happens going forward? [read post]
16 May 2023, 6:30 am
Ambassador to the United Nations Linda Thomas-Greenfield in May 2021 to attend the inauguration of [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:20 am
In Warren v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 8:43 pm
One of the strongest aspects of this litigation is that it has a case right on point: Clinton v New York (1998), which held the line-item veto unconstitutional. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
The difficulty comes because the different formulations of intention can lead to different results in any given particular case. [read post]
5 May 2023, 9:32 am
Given these facts, the trespass cases that plaintiff relies on are inapposite. [read post]
