Search for: "Times International Trading, Ltd."
Results 361 - 380
of 1,413
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2007, 6:52 am
Merpel adds, it's good to see the court taking such a close look at international conventions as an aid to the construction of domestic law: it almost makes one feel part of an international community. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
Only to an extent, holds the Court of Appeal.It was common ground that the context in which the allegedly infringing sign is used has to be taken into account: see Specsavers International Healthcare Ltd v Asda Stores Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 24. [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:05 pm
The claimants, Emerald Suppliers Ltd, imported cut flowers from Colombia and Kenya using the air freight services of BA and other international airlines. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 11:02 am
[Week ending 26 November]Time came for EMA relocation: and the winner is...Amsterdam! [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am
This decision followed the Second Circuit’s earlier decision in Hamilton International Ltd v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
* Proprietor may be unhappy because BE HAPPY is not a trade markCan one be happy with a “BE HAPPY” trade mark? [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
A new CJEU reference | Trial sequence in SEP litigation - time for a rejig? [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 6:21 pm
We agree with Dr Oppong that PIL has a role to play in making Nigeria attractive for international trade and commerce. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 6:38 am
| Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 10:08 pm
This principle was further affirmed in the case of Millennium & Copthorne International Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:37 am
The internal affairs doctrine was inapplicable, said the trial court, because the defendants were not the current officers, directors, and shareholders at the time of the lawsuit (the merger with PandaCo had changed that). [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:01 am
Does trade-mark likelihood of confusion actually exist? [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am
Medinol (EPLAW) (PatLit) EWHC (Ch) reviews principles for assessing infringement damages: Fearns (trading as Autopaint International) v Anglo-Dutch Paint & Chemical and others (Class 46) Dyson doesn’t clean up after all – EWHC (Pat) decision in Dyson Ltd v Vax Ltd (Class 99) (IP Dragon) (Class 99) A sight for sore eyes? [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:24 pm
The complaint named Vizio, Inc., AmTran Technology Co., Ltd., TPV Technology Ltd., TPV International, Inc., Top Victory Electronics Co., Ltd., and Envision Peripherals, Inc. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 8:23 am
Stanford International Bank, Ltd , et al., ND Texas)The asset freeze should continue because it is essential to protect assets from being dissipated, said the receiver, and will provide more time to review and analyze accounts associated with persons or proceeds involved in the Stanford fraud. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
Aldi make-up lookalike infringes copyright Islestarr Holdings Ltd v Aldi Stores Ltd [2019] EWHC 1473 (June 2019) A first for Retromark: a case not about trade marks. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
It’s time for Volume IV! [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:19 am
Although the case has been very widely reported on in the IP community and the wider press, some nuance has been lost in the discourse on the case and what it ultimately means.The case of Supermac's (Holdings) Ltd v McDonald's International Property Company Ltd concerned the trademark for the iconic Big Mac, which McDonald's had registered as an EU trademark in 1998 (EUTM 62638). [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:19 am
Although the case has been very widely reported on in the IP community and the wider press, some nuance has been lost in the discourse on the case and what it ultimately means.The case of Supermac's (Holdings) Ltd v McDonald's International Property Company Ltd concerned the trademark for the iconic Big Mac, which McDonald's had registered as an EU trademark in 1998 (EUTM 62638). [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:03 pm
"The objective of a border tax adjustment is to level the playing field between taxed domestic industries and untaxed foreign competition by ensuring that internal taxes on products are trade neutral. [read post]
