Search for: "Tomlinson v. Tomlinson"
Results 361 - 380
of 533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2012, 12:36 am
In Jones v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:11 pm
Case Law: Thornton v Telegraph Media Group, an offer of amends defence fails – Hugh Tomlinson QC Media Responsibility and Chris Jeffries Case Law: JIH v News Group Newspapers, anonymity regained – Edward Craven Case Law: Flood v Times Newspapers, Reynolds defence fails Strasbourg on Privacy and Reputation Part 3: “A balance between reputation and expression? [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
Half-day seminar on legal knowledge in a digital age, with speakers including Geoffrey Robertson QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Heather Brooke, Mike Dodd and Adam Wagner. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
Half-day seminar on legal knowledge in a digital age, with speakers including Geoffrey Robertson QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Heather Brooke, Mike Dodd and Adam Wagner. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 10:58 am
This was covered in our weekly round ups and some specific posts (see for example, Henry Fox’s February 2010 post “Case Law: Gray and Coogan v News Group and Mulcaire, phone hacking disclosure order“). [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 8:10 am
Standard Verlags GmbH v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
Half-day seminar on legal knowledge in a digital age, with speakers including Geoffrey Robertson QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Heather Brooke, Mike Dodd and Adam Wagner. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:27 pm
bas Klubs v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
On 21 December 2011, Eady J gave judgment in the “harassment” case of Neocleous v Jones ([2011] EWHC 3459 (QB)) Two judgments were also given in relation to “phone hacking indemnity” claims, Coulson v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3482 (QB)) and Mulcaire v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3469 (Ch)). [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm
In Mosley at para 229 Eady J directed himself to take into account awards in defamation cases, and referred also to Gleaner Company Ltd v Abrahams [2004] 1 AC 628. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 4:45 pm
The most popular posts of the year have been (in descending order – and excluding the Home Page, and Tables of Cases): Harassment and injunctions: Cheryl Cole – Natalie Peck Case Law: ETK v News Group Newspapers “Privacy Injunctions and Children” -Edward Craven The MP and the “Super-Injunction” – rumour, myth and distortion (again) News: Hemming MP’s “super injunction victim” named as sex abuse fabricator “The cases of… [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
Journalism and the PCC There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but four “resolved” complaints: Information Affairs Authority of Bahrain v The Independent, Clause 1, 14 December 2011 ; Mrs Kate Adams-Moor v The People, Clause 1, 13/12/2011; Brent Council v Kilburn Times Clause 1, 2, 12/12/2011; Mr Will Knock v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/12/2011. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Pierre v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm
Levy v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:22 am
In response to his article, Damian Tambini, in an article reproduced in the Inforrm’s blog, responds to Tomlinson’s article and highlights some of the challenges posed by implementing such a scheme. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm
Dr Damian Tambini discusses Hugh Tomlinson’s Inforrm post asking “Should journalists have privileges? [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
The PCC also published the following “resolved” cases on 25 November: Sir Alan Davies Daily Mail, Clause 10; Kenneth Brewster The Sun, Clause 1; Adam Bradford The Star (Sheffield), Clause 1; Karen Coleman Brentwood Gazette, Clause 1; CLEAR The Sun, Clause 1; Mrs Maria Blamires Daily Mail, Clause 5; Mrs Maria Blamires Daily Mirror, Clause 5; Lord Triesman The Mail on Sunday, Clauses 1, 3 and 10; Resolved – London Borough of Sutton v Sutton [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 1:40 am
Were it otherwise, the press would be unable to play its vital role of ‘public watchdog’ (Observer and Guardian v United Kingdom (1992) 14 EHRR 153, [59(b)]). [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 5:22 pm
Co. v. [read post]
