Search for: "Transaction Holdings, LLC" Results 361 - 380 of 2,477
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2022, 1:53 pm by Kenneth Jones
  At Xerdict Group LLC (a wholly-owned technology subsidiary of the Newark, NJ boutique firm Tanenbaum Keale LLP, known as TK), our branded product, CaseEnsembleTM, often tracks hundreds of fields (data related to plaintiffs, courts, products, locations, related parties, associated law firms, injuries or allegations, financials). [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 6:32 am by Alden Abbott
Neapco Holdings LLC, the Supreme Court has in essence told the patent community to “deal with it. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 1:57 pm by Rob Robinson
(Merger) (Combined Company Now Rampiva Global LLC) 29-Sep-20Acuity ELMMitratech 28-Sep-20GlobanetVeritas 8-Sep-20HaiveAyfie 3-Sep-20IntegroInnovative Discovery 19-Aug-20Venio Systems (Investee)Software Growth Partners (Investor) 13-Aug-20CaseLinesThomson Reuters 11-Aug-20NexLPReveal 5-Aug-20AnexsysXact Data Discovery 4-Aug-20NightOwl Global (Merger)HaystackID (Merger) 31-Jul-20Tracker CorpMitratech 14-Jul-20LightSpeedXact Data Discovery 8-Jul-20RVMXact Data Discovery 7-Jul-20NetGovernIpro… [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:56 am by John Elwood
Neapco Holdings LLC, 20-891Issues: (1) What standard determines whether a patent claim is “directed to” a patent-ineligible concept under step 1 of the Supreme Court’s two-step framework for determining whether an invention is eligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 6:36 am
KKR Financial Holdings LLC [2] and its progeny, it would be possible to lower the standard of review for the conduct of a SPAC’s board in connection with its initial business combination to the more deferential “business judgement rule” without having to ensure that there are independent directors who do not hold founder shares. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 6:36 am
KKR Financial Holdings LLC [2] and its progeny, it would be possible to lower the standard of review for the conduct of a SPAC’s board in connection with its initial business combination to the more deferential “business judgement rule” without having to ensure that there are independent directors who do not hold founder shares. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The claim, including any cause of action for "fraud on the court," is barred by the doctrines of res judicata (see Rojas v Romanoff, 186 AD3d 103, 108 [1st Dept 2020]) and collateral estoppel (see Conason v Megan Holding, LLC, 25 NY3d 1, 17 [2015]) based on dismissal of the "identical parallel federal court action" and a prior order of this Court affirming the orders that claimant now essentially seeks review of (Moskovits v Bank of Am. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The claim, including any cause of action for "fraud on the court," is barred by the doctrines of res judicata (see Rojas v Romanoff, 186 AD3d 103, 108 [1st Dept 2020]) and collateral estoppel (see Conason v Megan Holding, LLC, 25 NY3d 1, 17 [2015]) based on dismissal of the "identical parallel federal court action" and a prior order of this Court affirming the orders that claimant now essentially seeks review of (Moskovits v Bank of Am. [read post]
Among other things, the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) authorizes U.S. courts to enforce arbitration agreements in “contract[s] evidencing a transaction involving commerce,” but excludes from its scope “contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 6:36 am by Mark J. Levin and Steven W. Suflas
As support for its holding, the Court cited its previous landmark FAA preemption decisions in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:20 am by Michael Ehline
Enacted in April of 2014, Jake’s Law looked toward holding negligent drivers accountable for their actions. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 7:55 am by Edward T. Kang and Ryan T. Kirk
Following Estes, there was some confusion as to whether the court had announced a total prohibition on the broadcast coverage of trials, or if its holding was motivated by the particularly disruptive media presence in that case. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 10:04 am by John Elwood
City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; a similar question was presented in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 6:46 pm by Francis Pileggi
The Chancery Court recently required Authentix Holdings L.P. directors who were also employees of the brand protection services company’s controlling stockholder, private equity giant The Carlyle Group, to show that Authentix’s sale to Carlyle-connected Blue Water Energy met Delaware’s exacting entire fairness standard, in Manti Holdings LLC et al. v. [read post]