Search for: "Transit Commission v. United States"
Results 361 - 380
of 577
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [week ending on Sunday 7 June] - Swiss claims | Italian-sounding trade marks for cosmetics |… [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 5:34 pm
Both the United States Department of Justice and the United States Attorney for the Eastern District filed written objections to the IRS being made a party. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
United States, rests on a narrow, grudging reading of Congress’s war powers. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 4:32 pm
United States, a major ruling on military commissions. [read post]
Motor Carrier Exemption Applies to Drivers Who can be Expected to Drive Interstate Continue Reading…
19 May 2015, 11:24 am
McComb, a United States Supreme Court case decided in 1947 regarding the jurisdiction of the DOT’s predecessor, the Interstate Commerce Commission (“ICC”). [read post]
19 May 2015, 11:24 am
McComb, a United States Supreme Court case decided in 1947 regarding the jurisdiction of the DOT’s predecessor, the Interstate Commerce Commission (“ICC”). [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:31 am
The reason for the issuance was stated as “quit. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:20 am
Preska, Chief United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York, rule [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 11:19 am
The status of consumer data security law in the United States is at a crossroads. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
The result is both illuminating, and to some extent suggestive of the difficulties of communication in a context where consensus views are still very much in transition. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:33 am
As Richard Nixon’s HUD secretary and attorney general, they brought the case that persuaded the Eighth Circuit: United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:31 pm
Managers that participate in soft dollar programs should make sure that they have addressed any commission balances from the previous year. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:15 pm
If that’s the case then the plain language of Article V arguably could relieve Cuba from any treaty obligation to return her to the United States. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 6:55 am
And, with all this talk of authorizations to use military force, Cody Poplin shared the text of the documents from the last time the United States declared a state of war following the attacks on Pearl Harbor in this week’s Throwback Thursday. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am
And a federal court has recently agreed, because on April 10, 2014, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California ruled that A’lor is barred from infringing CHARRIOL cable trademarks by selling ALOR jewelry that uses such cable. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
For that purpose we consider the legal position of the subsidiary units of government in the United States and their relationship to federal power. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 4:52 pm
Supreme Court’s June 2013 decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 10:20 am
However, as the Safe Harbor only permits transfers from the EU to the United States, it is not a global solution. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
The Maryland Court of Appeals (the state’s highest court) agreed, concluding that Maryland’s scheme violated two prongs of the doctrinal test originally announced by the Supreme Court in Complete Auto Transit v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
