Search for: "Tucker v. State" Results 361 - 380 of 676
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am by John Mikhail
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 5:16 am by Victoria Clark
The Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:43 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-9711, Jackson v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 8:03 am
The Court agreed to decide whether the federal law that protects railroads from discriminatory state taxes allows the carriers to challenge the state's accounting method for fixing the market value of their property (CSX Transportation v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 12:15 pm by emagraken
Fowler, 2007 BCSC 1678, Madam Justice Holmes stated: [34]      In Tucker (Public Trustee of) v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 9:00 am by Michael Gibbs
  Yet the opening pages of Oleg V. [read post]