Search for: "U. S. v. Dollar*" Results 361 - 380 of 615
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm by Howard Knopf
These were the guidelines propounded in Wanda Noel’s booklet Copyright Matters!. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 3:22 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Second Department reversed, holding that “[u]nder the facts of this case,” the lower court “should have granted, in effect, the plaintiff’s application for an order authorizing him to purchase the defendant’s interest in the LLC upon its dissolution. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Let’s look at each briefly, and then his defenses.Schneiderman v. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 7:45 pm by Thomas & Pearl
Als u naar een bank kunt en de juiste papieren Golden Goose Shop hebt, kunt u 5% contant geld krijgen. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
UPONOR Minn2013http://t.co/T61hjeeHwT -> Joinder in BitTorrent copyright claim ok, TCYK, LLC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 4:40 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Larsen Decision The first was Larsen v Larsen (2022 NY Slip Op 32415(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County July 18, 2022]), in which Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice Leon Ruchelsman considered and rejected a pre-answer dismissal challenge to a shareholder derivative suit based upon the suing minority shareholder’s alleged conflict of interest. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Halperin v Van Dam  2020 NY Slip Op 31301(U) April 28, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 652124/2019 Judge: Andrea Masley  explains why the attorneys remain in the case. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 6:56 am by Eric
When Craigslist finally gave in and shut down its adult services category (with a whining F-U), people went crazy [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:55 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
“Failing to pay tax liabilities is corporate mismanagement,” ruled the Court in Fernandes v Matrix Model Staffing, Inc. (2022 NY Slip Op 31317(U) [Sup Ct, NY County 2022]), “which defeats a petitioner’s reasonable expectations sufficient to constitute oppression” under Section 1104-a of the Business Corporation Law (the “BCL”). [read post]