Search for: "U. S. v. Holder" Results 361 - 380 of 561
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2016, 3:27 am by Peter Mahler
LLC v Amedore Concord, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 50152(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Jan. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 3:27 am by Peter Mahler
LLC v Amedore Concord, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 50152(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Jan. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
Not according to a recent decision by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Saliann Scarpulla in Balkind v Nickel, 2018 NY Slip Op 31703(U) [Sup Ct NY County July 16, 2018], in which she dismissed a deadlock dissolution petition filed under Section 1104 of the Business Corporation Law brought by a 49% shareholder, despite his co-equal board and shareholder control. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 3:40 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In Matter of Yu v Bong Yu, 2018 NY Slip Op 32009(U) [Sup Ct, NY County Aug. 15, 2018], the court considered the important but novel question of what impact, if any, does a shareholder’s assignment of voting rights under a stock pledge agreement have on his or her standing to sue for statutory dissolution of the business as well as under the common law. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 8:33 am by Jeff Gamso
S. 457, 473 (2001).Of course, it's just a week since the Court decided Clapper v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
Remaking the DMCA in such a way would shift almost the entire burden and cost of enforcement from copyright holders to OSPs. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 2:06 pm
AGL guarantees all of AGASC's obligations, including the obligation to make periodic payments under the Non Qualified Assignment.Please note that the Boards of Directors of AGASC and AGL have taken appropriate actions acknowledging that AGASC is the assignee under the Non Qualified Assignment and Release in the case entitled XXXXXXX v YYYYYY and owner of the Annuity Contract XXXXXXX. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 2:28 am by Giles Peaker
Conclusion Historically, there has been little case law emerging from Wales on its diverging housing law – virtually no reported higher court litigation followed the Housing (Wales) Act 2014 (other than the notable Jarvis v Evans – see NL’s report here). [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:36 pm by Marie Louise
TTAB affirms mere descriptiveness refusal of STERNALVEST for sternal vests (TTABlog) District Court C D California: The Mongols have their colors back (for real): U.S. v Cavozos (Property, intangible) District Court S D New York: Numb Nuts, Part II: Olaes Enter., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 12:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Florida International University Board of Trustees v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
  Yes, said the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Multi Time Machine, Inc., v Amazon.com, Inc.; Amazon Services, LLC (No.2:11-cv-09076-DDP-MAN, here) when it reversed the District Court’s summary judgment order in Amazon’s favour. [read post]