Search for: "U. S. v. Marks"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,321
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
S., at 335–336 (internal quotation marks omitted).So is "critical mass" something no one believes in anymore? [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:06 am
Brach v Levine 2012 NY Slip Op 51312(U) Decided on July 16, 2012 Supreme Court, Kings County Battaglia, J. is an example. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:23 am
S. 367, 390 (2004) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); see also Firestone, 449 U. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:10 pm
S., at 315 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
[FN1] It is well settled that, "[u]nder FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection" (Matter of Empire Ch. of Associated Bldrs. and Contractors, Inc. v New York State Dept. of Transportation, ___ AD3d ___, ___, 2022 NY Slip Op 06852, *1 [3d Dept 2022] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
[FN1] It is well settled that, "[u]nder FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection" (Matter of Empire Ch. of Associated Bldrs. and Contractors, Inc. v New York State Dept. of Transportation, ___ AD3d ___, ___, 2022 NY Slip Op 06852, *1 [3d Dept 2022] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:30 am
Deston Therapeutics LLC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 5:55 pm
In reading Justice Alito’s dissent in Wyeth v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 9:10 pm
Here is the Court's per curiam Briscoe opinion from January 25, 2010: "SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 07-11191 MARK A. [read post]
30 May 2011, 2:08 pm
S. 167, 174 (2001) (normally we must give effect “to every clause and word of a statute” (internal quotation marks omitted)); Ratzlaf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 11:14 am
S. 167, 174 (2001) (normally we must give effect “to every clause and word of a statute” (internal quotation marks omitted)); Ratzlaf v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:36 am
A recent decision by Judge Mark S. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 2:35 pm
Wisconsin’s aggregate limits have already been challenged in Young v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:16 pm
U. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:22 am
It must be shown that the alleged deceit “reaches the level of egregious conduct or a chronic and extreme pattern of behavior” (Savitt v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 126 AD3d 506, 507 [1st Dept 2015] [internal quotation marks and .citation omitted]; but see Dupree v Voorhees, 102 AD3d 912, 913 [2d Dept 2013]). [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 6:44 am
In Texas v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:52 am
S. 830, 837 (1996) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:49 am
The cases of Holder v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 2:28 pm
Davis v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:56 am
(internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
