Search for: "U.S. v. Sealed Case"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,618
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2016, 4:14 am
On Friday, the court added one case to its merits docket, granting cert in Honeycutt v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm
Dries in yesterday's U.S. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 9:25 am
On June 4, 2010, Northern District Judge Claudia Wilken denied a motion requesting reconsideration of the Court’s previous order certifying National and California classes on behalf of single-pane sealed glass front fireplaces owners, previously discussed here. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:30 am
Pannu v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:52 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
The Lee case resurfaced yesterday in an opinion issued by the First District Court of Appeal in Wood v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:22 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), during sentencing because the jury made no finding of fact as to whether the substances involved in the case were Schedule II, III or IV substances? [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:02 am
Other courts apply a parody/satire distinction similar to the fair use analysis in copyright cases (see Campbell v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:11 am
NYCLU gets the reports.The case is United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Calhoun, 516 U.S. 199 (1996), which would require application of maritime uniformity and maritime remedies over state interests and state remedies in a maritime wrongful-death case in territorial waters. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:56 am
Helmerich & Payne International, a case involving pleading standards for expropriation cases against foreign governments filed in U.S. courts. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 5:16 am
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 1:19 pm
On Jan. 8, the U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am
In April 2010, the Government filed a superseding Indictment in U.S. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 12:09 pm
Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007); Ashcroft v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:47 am
When an invention is conceived, it is generally presumed to be owned by the inventor under U.S. patent law. [1] The case of Stanford v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:47 am
When an invention is conceived, it is generally presumed to be owned by the inventor under U.S. patent law. [1] The case of Stanford v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
As of Monday, the case remains under seal, so is not publicly available. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 10:15 am
The U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:34 am
In The National Law Journal, Tony Mauro reports that The Slants, the Asian-American rock band whose dispute with the U.S. [read post]
