Search for: "UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES"
Results 361 - 380
of 3,031
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2017, 3:00 pm
"More specifically, the enforceability of a settlement agreement in a diversity case tried in a federal district court in Texas is governed by the provisions of Rule 11 [of the] Texas Rules of Civil Procedure (`Texas Rule 11'). [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 7:52 am
First, “[i]n failing to apply California choice of law rules, the district court committed a legal error. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:08 am
That approach, however, doesn’t always work, particularly if the district court doesn’t employ the appropriate rigorous analysis under Rule 23, as a case decided on New Year’s Eve demonstrates. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 8:41 am
The district court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and granted them a judgment of $5.8 million. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 2:30 pm
By looking to the pleading rules, the court has done defendants with strong positions on the merits a grave disservice. [read post]
30 May 2011, 7:33 am
Justice Benke of the the Fourth District reversed the trial court's determination that FC § 1612 could be applied retroactively. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 7:28 pm
That question was not decided by the District judge, and was not an issue that the judge sent up to the Circuit Court. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
At this point in the appeal — when the Court is explaining its earlier ruling — the Court of Appeals articulated the issue as to whether Chevron could affirmatively use the Uniform Foreign Country Money-Judgments Recognition Act as enacted in New York. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 7:22 pm
District Court for the District of Colorado ruled that the EEOC had satisfied all of its pre-suit conciliation requirements and demonstrated sufficient evidence to proceed to trial on behalf of a class of Muslim women who allege that Jetstream Ground Services, Inc. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 7:01 am
We have no uniform rule on what happens to equity in an asset, built up during a Chapter 13 plan, when the case converts to Chapter 7. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 4:08 pm
Last month, a Philadelphia state court‘s reversal of a six-year-old kindergartener’s expulsion sparked renewed controversy over school rules and school district law. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:05 am
Ruling against Defendants, the court agreed with the Plaintiff’s latter argument. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 6:00 am
Repeals the power of the district courts of appeal to make rules and regulations. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 11:12 am
District Court Judge Lee Rosenthal, who chaired the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures during a crucial period beginning in 2003. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:30 am
Because class certification had been denied, and the claims of the remaining individual plaintiffs did not exceed $5,000,000 and the amount claimed by any one individual plaintiff did not exceed $75,000, the existence of subject matter jurisdiction was unclear, and as the courts considering the question have not arrived at a uniform result, the District Court requested the positions of the parties on the issue. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 1:36 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 11:48 am
In the first federal court in California to issue a rule on classification of gig-economy workers, the Northern District of California recently concluded that restaurant delivery drivers are properly classified as independent contractors instead of employees under California law. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 10:55 am
While the district court rejected the application of Rule 23(b)(2) on this basis, the plaintiff’s claims still survived under Rule 23(b)(3) because, as explained above, it appeared that superiority and predominance had been adequately claimed. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
” The court then held that the district court erred in denying class treatment. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 7:29 am
The Khoury court noted that it agreed with the Northern District of Texas in its criticism of the 2nd Court of Appeals ruling in Williamson v. [read post]
