Search for: "US v. Michael Davis" Results 361 - 380 of 665
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Rob Davies, a Guardian journalist was denied a press pass for a major gambling industry exhibition. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 9:55 pm
District Judge Michael Davis called the lawyers back to his courtroom. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
What Happens After the Measure Qualifies: Political Hurdles in California Let us assume that Mr. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
” In challenging this federal directive, San Francisco relies on principles of federalism as expounded in Printz v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:45 am by INFORRM
  Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ). [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 6:14 pm by Ben Sheffner
The jury in the first trial in 2007 awarded $9,250, totaling $222,000 for 24 songs, but that verdict was thrown out after Judge Michael Davis determined that one of his jury instructions was improper.It remains unclear exactly what a third trial will look like. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:58 pm by Joshua Matz
”  Ilana Haramati and Michael A. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am by Rob Robinson
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Coffing Hoist Div., Duff-Norton Co., 528 A.2d 590 (Pa. 1987)(evidence of industry standards are inadmissible in strict products liability actions) Davis v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm by bndmorris
The class spent the entire semester on United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 1:25 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 11 December 2024 the Court of Appeal (Sharp P, Nicola Davies and Dingemans LJJ) will hand down judgment in the important misuse of private information “representative action” case of Prismall v Google. [read post]