Search for: "US v. Michael Harris"
Results 361 - 380
of 691
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
Wenger, + CAP response Unions Make Us Strong Julius G. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:41 am
” Scott v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Harry Barko v. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 3:38 pm
MICHAEL D. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
If you are a publisher who would like to participate in this feature, please let us know via the site’s contact form. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:14 pm
The Sixth Circuit used the Justices’ ruling in Scott v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
In Henry v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Michael C. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:37 am
This morning the Court will hear oral arguments in (among other cases) Harris v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
What Happens After the Measure Qualifies: Political Hurdles in California Let us assume that Mr. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 12:43 pm
Harris, the U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:37 pm
The moderator was Michael Loch from GSMA and panellists included David Muus from KPN, Heinz Polsterer from IPR management, Simon Harris from Vodafone and Olivier Thirard from Orange. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The number in parens is the number of times I've used the tag. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 6:39 pm
Under its 2002 decision in Harris v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
This seems to fly in the face the idea of presumption of innocent under section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.[17] Although the idea of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at trial seems to help an accused, this is not the same standard that a prosecutor has to use in deciding whether to charge someone – the standard is lower: “reasonable prospects for conviction. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
This seems to fly in the face the idea of presumption of innocent under section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.[17] Although the idea of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at trial seems to help an accused, this is not the same standard that a prosecutor has to use in deciding whether to charge someone – the standard is lower: “reasonable prospects for conviction. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 4:35 pm
In Florida v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 4:33 pm
In Florida v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 1:52 pm
Not only that, in this case out of Harris County, unlike in Galveston, the DA's office attempted to contest the findings on behalf of the defendant but were rebuffed both by the trial court and now the CCA, which used the same boilerplate language they used to grant 18 prior cases. [read post]
