Search for: "US v. Powell"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,336
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2019, 10:39 am
Just last term, in Timbs v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 8:12 am
In Bucklew v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:52 am
However, Powell asserted Eleventh Amendment immunity against Bell’s claims and MRNISO claimed it was protected by the fair use doctrine. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 10:50 am
Powell v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 3:43 am
Secretary of State, Colin Powell. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 9:52 am
As per Powell v Dacorum Borough Council (2019) EWCA Civ 23, at (44) (our report) “In my judgment, the previous decisions of the courts on the present subject of the application and working of the PSED, as on all subjects, have to be taken in their context. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:00 am
Powell wrote on behalf of the majority. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 7:08 am
Moreover, in Chisholm v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
"Accordingly, the Appellate Division rejected Educator’s appeal, explaining that in the event "the evidence is conflicting and room for choice exists," a court may not weigh the evidence or reject the choice made by the arbitrator.* See Powell v Board of Educ. of Westbury Union Free School Dist., 91 AD3d 955, affirmed 30 NY2d 889.** In Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, the Court of Appeals held that when reviewing §3020-a compulsory… [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
"Accordingly, the Appellate Division rejected Educator’s appeal, explaining that in the event "the evidence is conflicting and room for choice exists," a court may not weigh the evidence or reject the choice made by the arbitrator.* See Powell v Board of Educ. of Westbury Union Free School Dist., 91 AD3d 955, affirmed 30 NY2d 889.** In Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, the Court of Appeals held that when reviewing §3020-a compulsory… [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 10:57 am
Powell, 811 S.W.2d 913, 917 (Tex. 1991)); see also Low v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 10:20 am
First, Daniels v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 12:37 am
London and Quadrant HR v Patrick [2019] EWHC 1263 (QB) follows hard on the footsteps of Powell v Dacorum BC [2019] EWCA Civ 29 and Forward v Aldwyck Housing Group Ltd [2019] EWHC 24 (QB) (our note here), with Turner J making some fairly caustic observations about the use of the public sector equality duty in possession cases. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
Since 1968, only three justices — Lewis Powell, William Rehnquist and Elena Kagan — have lacked judicial experience prior to joining the court. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm
Please let us know if there are reserved judgments which should be added to this list. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:04 pm
But he took comfort in Judge Gilstrap's decision in PanOptis v Huawei and felt that this would not happen more widely. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
Powell, 839 P.2d 139, 147 (N.M. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
Powell, 839 P.2d 139, 147 (N.M. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am
Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution prohibits “Bill[s] of Attainder,” laws that, under Supreme Court precedent, “legislatively determine[] guilt and inflict[] punishment upon an identifiable individual without provision of the protections of a judicial trial” (Nixon v. [read post]
