Search for: "US v. Reid"
Results 361 - 380
of 671
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2013, 6:33 am
That case — Salinas v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
Democratic Majority Leader Harry Reid reports that he has been confronted with some 386 GOP-lead filibusters in the past six years. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 3:20 am
Palmer’s comprehensive English translation of colonial Louisiana’s Code Noir of 1724 will be particularly useful to researchers. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:13 am
Ceresia, after a Frye hearing (see Frye v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:15 am
First, let us start with [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:27 am
True, the Supreme Court has supposedly said otherwise, in Reid v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 5:35 am
In Regina v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:00 am
Opening Statements today at the REGJB in State v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 11:09 am
By Andrew DelaneyState v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 9:37 pm
Reid v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:37 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:30 am
Graham (R-S.C.) who said he thought Reid was lying, and Va. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 8:02 am
The opinion here raises tantalizing questions about Reid’s use of “the word’s out” to preface his statement about Romney. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 2:18 pm
Reid, the opinion indicates the possibility that miniature versions of the sculpture might have been prepared. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:12 pm
The dangers of proceeding without any agreement is illustrated by the recent Wisconsin case of Woods v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:40 am
Spiegel v Rowland, 552 US 1257; see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442; McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301-302; Gioeli v Vlachos, 89 AD3d 984; Dempster v Liotti, 86 AD3d 169, 176). [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 9:42 am
In CCNV v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:33 am
Norwich Pharmacal orders were originally commonly used in fraud case, for example against banks to identify customers who had used accounts with those banks to facilitate a fraud. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:45 am
The Court--or rather the same five Justices appointed by Republicans who brought us Citizens United--held that Citizens United squarely forbids states from banning corporate spending on elections--whatever the facts in that state. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:05 am
Shaun discusses the Second Circuit’s decision in Townsend v. [read post]
