Search for: "US v. Robert Barnes"
Results 361 - 380
of 585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am
” For The Washington Post Robert Barnes notes that the case “is one of several in which the Trump administration switched sides; the Obama administration had backed challengers of Ohio’s process. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that Gorsuch used his first assignment “to showcase both his writing style and much-touted devotion to a textual interpretation of the laws Congress passes. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:16 am
” In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on a commencement speech delivered by Chief Justice John Roberts at his son’s ninth-grade graduation, noting that the address “touched on universal themes, such as a parent’s worry about whether he or she is making the right decisions for their child. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 9:25 am
Affirmed.In Robert Gibson v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
” For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes observes that “similar to a debate that has consumed Washington for the past 15 months, a major issue for the court is separating ‘the president’ from ‘this president. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am
Roberts Jr. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am
” Additional coverage comes from Adam Liptak for The New York Times, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Andrew Chung at Reuters, and David Savage for the Los Angeles Times, who reports that “[m]ost of the justices said they were not interested in ruling broadly. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
Supreme Court … “[n]ot once, but twice,” comes from Robert Barnes for The Washington Post. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 4:30 am
We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am
” We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm
The closeness of the facts to a "bargain" are a factor in the ultimate resolution of the case: see Robert Walker LJ in Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, [2003] 1 P & CR 8 at [41] ff especially at [45]. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm
The closeness of the facts to a "bargain" are a factor in the ultimate resolution of the case: see Robert Walker LJ in Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, [2003] 1 P & CR 8 at [41] ff especially at [45]. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 3:54 am
” Briefly: Robert Barnes writes for The Washington Post that “[r]evivals of allegations against [Justice Brett] Kavanaugh roil the White House, Capitol Hill and the Democratic presidential nomination trail,” but “at the Supreme Court, once you’re in, you’re in. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:04 pm
" Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has a news update headlined "Supreme Court begins review of health-care law. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Tucker Carlson Just Inadvertently Helped Raise $14,000 for Abortion Rights MSN – Steven Zeitchik (Washington Post) | Published: 6/27/2022 Hours after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:10 am
” Robert Barnes reports for The Washington Post that “[t]he court’s conservatives were criticized by liberals and religious conservatives for that decision. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 3:21 am
” For The Washington Post (subscription required), Robert Barnes and Ann Marimow report that “[t]he legal cases concerning President Trump, his finances and his separation-of-powers disputes with Congress are moving like a brush fire to the Supreme Court, and together provide both potential and challenge for the Roberts court in its aspiration to be seen as nonpartisan. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
From the States and Municipalities Alabama – Supreme Court Stops Lower Court Order Requiring Alabama to Draw a New District Voting Map Favorable to Black Residents MSN – Robert Barnes (Washington Post) | Published: 2/7/2022 The U.S. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 3:40 am
For The Washington Post (subscription required), Robert Barnes and Ann Marimow report that “Trump’s private lawyers asked Chief Justice John G. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
According to Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, the Vance and Mazars rulings, taken together, delivered “a nuanced and likely landmark lesson on the separation of powers and limits of presidential authority. [read post]
