Search for: "US v. Spencer" Results 361 - 380 of 780
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2014, 1:44 pm by Gustavo Arballo
El juez tenía facultades sancionatorias, y las usó a fondo: lo excluyó de la matrícula al abogado Bradley. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:34 am by David Smith
The post Spencer v Taylor- Some Analysis appeared first on Nearly Legal. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:30 pm
"He also commented that in Interflora 1 (Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer plc [2012] EWCA Civ 1501 [noted by the IPKat here] Lewison L.J. had stated that different considerations from the general position on surveys apply where the issue is whether a registered mark has acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 6:46 am by Giles Peaker
The post Spencer v Taylor – section 21 news appeared first on Nearly Legal. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
  Gasguzzlers ‘R Us didn’t get its federal bailout and goes bankrupt. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Spencer, 2014 SCC 43 Four issues, answered as follows: (1) Police obtaining subscriber information matching the IP address from the ISP constitute a search? [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
Spencer, 700 F.3d 317 (U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:23 am by John Gregory
More recently, the Court held in Voltage Pictures v John Doe and Jane Doe (the Teksavvy case) that the information could be disclosed but only under strict conditions about its use. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
At issue was whether the Charter applied to the search which led to the discovery of cocaine in her possession and whether the trial judge erred in the use and … France (Republic) v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:36 am by Mark Lewis
This is a case that, in my opinion, is crying out for a sub nom and I’m going to use the Slaw platform to try and start a groundswell of support for R v Spencer to be more commonly known as: IP Freely. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 8:07 am
I’ve got to run right now, but I thought I’d note this, and point to the 2-to-1 decision, Blackhorse v. [read post]