Search for: "USA v. Vehicle" Results 361 - 380 of 541
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2013, 7:33 am by Joy Waltemath
Pointing to a security guard’s assertion that he did not leave his post early after a car accident, that two younger employees were not fired after they were in accidents, that the HR director who fired him knew his age, and that a supervisor who made ageist remarks was involved in the termination decision, a divided Eighth Circuit panel reversed a district court’s order granting summary judgment for an employer on the Title VII age bias claim (Johnson v Securitas Security… [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
– America-Israel Patent Law) Accelerated examination (Inventive Step) Suggestions for USPTO Director David Kappos (IP Watchdog) Mystery graph of the day (Patently-O) The crisis in the American patent system (CanadaPatentBlog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC debates stays pending re-examination; Injunctions when claims are of ‘suspect validity’: Fresenius USA, Inc v Baxter International, Inc (Patently-O) (IP Law Observer) (Gray on… [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:01 am by SHG
 USA Today’s Brad Heath twitted a great quote** from United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:32 am by Ben
” In 2014, SMASH 137 participated in an art project called the “Z Garage” in Detroit, Michigan USA. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 8:53 am by Goldfinger Injury Lawyers
  Each was also awarded an additional $5,000 based on McDermott v Ramadanovic Estate ((1988), 27 BCLR (2d) 45 (BC SC)), where a 13 year old was awarded $20,000 for “emotional scars” as a result of witnessing both of her parents’ death in a motor vehicle accident. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 8:03 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
Vanguard Car Rental USA, Inc., 540 F.3d 1242, 1249-50 (11th Cir. 2008), declined to sustain the Graves Amendment, 49 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 1:00 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
The account stated theory as a vehicle to avoid having to prove up the terms of the contract is addressed in another post. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
Jan. 7, 2011) (plaintiffs “cannot show that [defendant] breached its duty by not recalling their vehicle”).While this precedent goes well beyond prescription drug and medical device cases, one of the best cases is from the same court that, long ago, invented strict liability. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:47 am by stevemehta
T-Mobile USA, Inc. (2007) 152 Cal.App.4th 571, 583.) [read post]