Search for: "USA v. Vehicle"
Results 361 - 380
of 541
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2011, 6:02 am
United States, 10-8583, which presents the question whether evading arrest in a vehicle is a “crime of violence” under Sentencing Guidelines § 4B1.2(a), for Sykes v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 5:16 am
See Bauman v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:18 pm
"Castle" remains what it is -- a star vehicle for Nathan Fillion. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:40 pm
Murphy Oil, USA, 609 F.3d 1049 (5th Cir. 2010), and Native Village of Kivalina v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:12 am
As the result, many advisers of hedge funds, private equity funds, and other private investment vehicles will be required to register as investment advisers under the Advisers Act unless they qualify for one of two new registration exemptions. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
, Huie, Fernambucq & Stewart LLP, Birmingham, Ala. 14 $124,546,733 Motor Vehicle Pacheco v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 12:27 pm
The product defect case of Amir Sitafalwalla v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 12:27 pm
Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc., 2008 cv 03001 (E.D. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:37 pm
Converting heavy-duty trucks and high-fuel use commercial fleet vehicles to natural gas can reduce our OPEC dependence now while we wait for technology to power the vehicles of tomorrow. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:40 am
From last week’s list, Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 7:48 am
Filed March 8, 2011, by Sunflex USA. (11) 95/000,620 (paper filed) – U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm
Bell (2006), and Schlup v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am
Anova Food (Docket Report) ITC reverses initial determination and finds no violation in Certain Connecting Devices (337-TA-587) (ITC Law Blog) ITC issues limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders in Certain Automotive Vehicles (337-TA-722) (ITC Law Blog) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Graco – False marking complaint alleging due diligence, prior litigation, and financing activities concerning falsely marked products: Brinkmeier v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm
Title: Maples v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:03 am
The '395 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Commil USA v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:03 am
The '395 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Commil USA v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:08 am
Justice Ginsburg added that a 2009 decision, District Attorney’s Office v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
Supreme Court in an appeal by T-Mobile USA, Inc., whose own arbitration clause had been found unconscionable (T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
§ 1140, permits an employer to discharge an employee for making unsolicited internal complaints regarding violations of the statute.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (3d Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of the American Association of Retired PersonsPetitioner's reply Title: Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
