Search for: "United States Army Corps of Engineers" Results 361 - 380 of 908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2021, 8:57 am by Unknown
United States Army Corps of Engineers (Dakota Access Pipeline)United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 1:48 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:26 pm by WIMS
(Hearts Bluff) appeals from the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims (the Claims Court) dismissing its claim for just compensation under the Fifth Amendment for an alleged taking based on the Army Corps of Engineers' (the Corps') denial of Hearts Bluff's proposal to operate a mitigation bank on its property. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 10:21 am by Harry Styron
Filed under: agriculture, Missouri, Missouri economy, Ozarks, Ozarks economy, real estate development, table rock, water law (streams, lakes and groundwater) Tagged: Flood, Mississippi, Missouri River, United States Army Corps of Engineers [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Army Corps of Engineers and then as an environmental law associate for Vinson & Elkins LLP in Washington, D.C. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 7:37 am by Cristian Soler and James E. Lapeze
Army Corps of Engineers to Driftwood LNG – a liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal under construction near Lake Charles. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:20 am by Brad Kuhn
 Army Corps of Engineers embarked on a multi-phased update to the Prado Dam which would ultimately raise the flood inundation level by 10 feet (to 566 feet). [read post]
19 May 2017, 10:52 am by Jim Martin
 After graduating from the United States Military Academy at West Point in 1839, he accepted a positing in the Corps of Engineers. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 1:55 pm by WIMS
Army Corps of Engineers, Water Resource Policies and Authorities: Application of Federal Regulations Implementing Section 404 to Civil Works Projects (Sept. 18, 1979). [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 2:33 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The Court of Federal Claims awarded $5.7 million, finding that the Army Corps of Engineers’ actions foreseeably destroyed and degraded more than 18 million board feet of timber, left habitat unable to regenerate, and preempted Petitioner’s use and enjoyment. [read post]