Search for: "United States Army Corps of Engineers" Results 361 - 380 of 908
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2017, 2:13 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C.): March 7 Order Materials here. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 2:33 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Army Corps of Engineers to review and reconsider the controversial “waters of the United States” (a.k.a. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:30 pm
The reversal was a slap in the face of the tribe and its treaty rights with the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 3:21 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C.): Complaint An excerpt: This is a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief to stop the construction and operation of the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) until the Defendant United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) completes an environmental impact statement (EIS) that fully analyzes the impacts of the DAPL to the Tribe’s Treaty rights and… [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Army Corps of Engineers to expedite review of the project and which is a reversal of the Army Corps’ decision in November to deny the easement and consider alternate routes for the pipeline. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:36 am by Anthony B. Cavender
New directions in environmental and regulatory policy are outlined in these Executive Orders and Presidential Memorandums that have been issued in the past few days: An Executive Order, dated January 30, 2017, requiring federal executive departments and agencies, whenever they propose to add a new regulation, to delete two existing regulations (Presidential Executive Order on Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs); A Memorandum dated January 24, 2017, directing the Secretary of… [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 5:30 am by Chris Mirasola
    United States Not all is gloomy for US partners and allies in the Asia-Pacific. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin S. Daniel
Army Corps of Engineers—which denied an easement for the Dakota Access Pipeline in December 2016, pending completion of an Environmental Impact Statement—to expedite review of that pipeline. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 1:36 pm by Candace Shields
” As noted in a previous blog, the Court in BCPeabody held that the Army Corps of Engineers abused its discretion by failing to clarify an obvious mistake, in that case the submission of identical project information sheets. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 9:15 am by Sarah M Donnelly
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 1:16-cv-01796-JEB: “MINUTE ORDER: As explained in open court following today’s hearing, the Court ORDERS that Dakota Access’s 80 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED and its Motion for Preliminary Injunction is WITHDRAWN WITHOUT PREJUDICE. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The United States enjoyed a brief monopoly of atomic bombs from 1945 until 1949, when the U.S.S.R. detonated its own uranium and plutonium bombs. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 8:31 am by Jonathan H. Adler
In one statement, Trump pledged to “eliminate the unconstitutional” rule and to “direct the Army Corps of Engineers and EPA to no longer use this unlawful rule and related guidance documents in making jurisdictional determinations. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 8:19 am by Jason Smith
(Wikimedia Commons) The first legislative measure, A-793, requires New Jersey’s Secretary of Agriculture and the Commissioner of Environmental Protection (DEP) to seek to establish with the United States Army Corps of Engineers a joint application process for aquaculture projects that require both State and federal permits, licenses, or approvals for aquaculture projects in the State. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 7:13 pm by Cymie Payne
Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) effectively put the pipeline project on hold. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 8:49 pm by Cymie Payne
Army Corps of Engineers should not grant an easement across federal lands; the United States failed to adequately consult and to prepare an adequate assessment of environmental and social impacts of the pipeline, required under both U.S. and international law; and the United States has failed to protect peaceful protestors. [read post]