Search for: "United States of America v. Justice"
Results 361 - 380
of 4,064
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2012, 7:14 am
The Supreme Court's decision in the Stolen Valor Act case, United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 12:22 pm
In United States v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 4:55 pm
But what the courts seem to overlook is that Article III is one of several articles to the Constitution of the United States which begins: We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United… [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:10 pm
United States and Microsoft v. i4i garnered the most coverage. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 3:49 am
First up is United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 10:59 pm
Docketed: Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Case Nos.: (08-10100) ~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jan 30 2008 Application (07A630) for stay of execution of sentence of death pending the filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Thomas. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 2:08 pm
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act)The Shawnee Tribe v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 11:51 pm
The suit, captioned United States of America, Ex Rel. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:00 am
Claim for massive environmental tort in Latin America? [read post]
3 May 2019, 3:42 am
Briefly: At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie casts doubt on suggestions by Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh during oral argument in Rucho v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 9:54 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an opinion as to Summary Judgment in the case of Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 4:13 am
Since the international slave trade was illegal in the United States (while enslaving blacks already in the United States remained lawful for decades thereafter), slaves bound to America were released, but because slavery was legal in Portugal and Spain, slaves “belonging” to those owners were returned to bondage. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 8:05 am
Sachs Case, on Sovereign Immunity The text is in Spanish, but the English abstract reads: This Note addresses an outline and a critical approach of the Decision of the Supreme Court of the United States of America in Sachs case. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:31 pm
Apparently putting the nail in the coffin, Justice Scalia turned the discussion to the interests of the United States as creditor – parroting the argument of the Solicitor General that approving the debtor’s plan here would prejudice the United States when it appears as a creditor – because of its general inability to advance funds to bid in a bankruptcy proceeding. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 2:26 pm
We sympathize with Appellants’ individual plights, apparently more freighted with duty and sacrifice than benefits and privilege, but the Citizenship Clause is textually ambiguous as to whether “in the United States” encompasses America’s unincorporated territories and we hold it “impractical and anomalous,” see Reid v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 2:26 pm
We sympathize with Appellants’ individual plights, apparently more freighted with duty and sacrifice than benefits and privilege, but the Citizenship Clause is textually ambiguous as to whether “in the United States” encompasses America’s unincorporated territories and we hold it “impractical and anomalous,” see Reid v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 2:26 pm
We sympathize with Appellants’ individual plights, apparently more freighted with duty and sacrifice than benefits and privilege, but the Citizenship Clause is textually ambiguous as to whether “in the United States” encompasses America’s unincorporated territories and we hold it “impractical and anomalous,” see Reid v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 11:44 am
The Paramount Consent Decrees went into effect in 1948 following the decision of the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 11:44 am
The Paramount Consent Decrees went into effect in 1948 following the decision of the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
