Search for: "United States v. Bailey"
Results 361 - 380
of 407
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2008, 3:38 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:01 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Antreaun Rice v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 12:37 pm
District Judge, Nebraska, who cited a legal blog in his opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 3:45 pm
In Bailey v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 12:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
(NFP), a 6-page opinion, Judge Bailey writes:Christopher and Trease S. [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:33 pm
We affirm. 08a0184p.06 2008/05/16 Bailey v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 8:25 am
United States v. $545,855.00 in United States Currency, 07-1347 (8th Cir. [read post]
2 May 2008, 1:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:13 pm
If Westlaw is to be believed, Ed’s first argument was in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:46 am
United States Steel Corporation, a 27-page opinion, Judge Bailey writes:Northern Indiana Public Service Company ("NIPSCO") appeals the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission's ("IURC" or "Commission") grant of United States Steel Corporation's ("U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Young Moon, appeals from her conviction and sentence entered by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee on April 25, 2006, for three counts of health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Lopez-DeLeon, No. 06-41553 A sentence for illegal reentry is affirmed where defendant's prior California conviction for sexual intercourse with a minor qualified as a "crime of violence" within section 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, as documents established that the victim in that matter was under the age of 14. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 3:24 am
Attorney for the State: Joby Jerrells, Indianapolis, IN. 9:45 AM - Brenwick Associates, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because statutes enacted under the Spending Clause of the United States Constitution must provide clear notice to the States of their liabilities should they decide to accept federal funding under those statutes, and because we conclude that NCLB fails to provide clear notice as to who bears the additional costs of compliance, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 08a0007p.06 Blackburn… [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 4:08 am
United States, 208 U.S. 161 (1908)(striking down ban on "yellow-dog" contracts that forbade workers from joining trade unions.)Muller v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
This list was put together by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 3:10 pm
This list was put together by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
