Search for: "United States v. Black" Results 361 - 380 of 4,317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2008, 9:34 pm
In addition to its more major problems, NMCCA's opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
“ Thurgood Marshall in 1957 On September 15, 1959, Boynton filed a petition for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 4:07 pm by NARF
United States (Federal Trust Breach; Osage Headrights) Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray Reservation v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm by ToddHenderson
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:21 am
United States and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am by SHG
While the image of Justice Antonin Scalia "turning somersaults" is intriguing, it certainly seems that the Supremes are united in their view that "honest services fraud" is an incurably vague catch-all, after yesterday's oral argument in Black v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Eleventh Circuit, with a pretty tough panel (Chief Judge Edmondson, and Judges Tjoflat and Hill) affirmed a below guidelines sentence in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 11:33 am by Steven Cohen
Black & Decker – United States District Court – Northern District of Illinois – June 14th, 2016) involves products liability. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 11:33 am by Steven Cohen
Black & Decker – United States District Court – Northern District of Illinois – June 14th, 2016) involves products liability. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
They want the United States Supreme Court to take up again the constitutionality of using the death penalty in that way.They expect that if it does so, the Court will overturn its 2008 Kennedy v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 12:44 pm
At the bottom of page 326 in this opinion today, Judge Betty Fletcher uses "sur-reply" when describing the response of the United States to the reply brief of the defendant. [read post]