Search for: "United States v. Brooks"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,079
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
In Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 3:39 pm
Goldsmith and once in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 9:40 am
Matthews v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:49 am
Dukes, the United States Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit will hear oral arguments on Friday in Davis v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Louis, Missouri): United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am
United States, in which the court held on Monday that a decision not to grant a proportional sentence reduction does not require a detailed written explanation. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 6:50 am
In terrorism news, Bobby noted the arrival of yet another material support case involving supporters of ISIS within the United States. [read post]
8 May 2018, 12:13 pm
The shoring up of Hezbollah’s position, as well as the election’s huge blow to the movement by Lebanon’s most prominent Sunni Muslim politician and ally of the West, Prime Minister Saad Hariri, will likely alarm the United States, Israel, and Gulf Arab states like Saudi Arabia. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:38 pm
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive Guide for cerebral palsy. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:10 pm
Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:05 pm
District Court for the District of Oregon to dismiss Juliana v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 1:42 pm
Remember when she couldn't name a single Supreme Court case other than Roe v Wade? [read post]
2 May 2020, 8:39 am
House of Representatives v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:04 pm
Mo Brooks and Rep. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 9:05 pm
Artist now suing the state. [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:55 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether its ruling in Padilla v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 2:57 pm
United States which held that the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program conflicted with limits on executive authority in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:02 pm
Daniel Brooks of Hogan Lovells, Werit’s solicitors, introduced the case. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:25 am
Thus, the declarations were not subject to the general rule of grand jury secrecy because they were not “evidence actually presented to [the grand jury]” nor “anything that may tend to reveal what transpired before it” (see United States v Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 923 F2d 241, 244 [2d Cir 1991], citing Fed Rules Crim Pro rule 6[e][2]). [read post]
