Search for: "United States v. Certain Real Estate Property"
Results 361 - 380
of 553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2019, 2:25 pm
Notable Trade Secrets Cases On the civil side, a Texas jury awarded over $700 million in damages to a technology start-up regarding the alleged misappropriation of its real estate valuation trade secrets. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:01 am
§§ 1441 and 1331, because plaintiffs allegations concerning the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act ("RESPA") and the Truth in Lending Act ("TILA") arise under the laws of the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 6:45 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 8:21 am
Short sales also help mortgage lenders by avoiding the costs of foreclosure, including the burden of maintaining and reselling properties acquired through the foreclosure process.Q 2. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Ct.,2023) the Automatic Orders that were served action provided: (1) Neither part [sic] shall sell, transfer, encumber, conceal, assign, remove or in any way dispose of, without the consent of the other party in writing, or by order of the court, any property (including, but not limited to, real estate, personal property, cash accounts, stocks, mutual funds, bank accounts, cars and boats) individually or jointly held by the parties, except in the usual course of… [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:39 am
The United States In the United States [“the US”], the criteria of “certain minimum contact” with the jurisdiction where the cyber transaction has occurred must be met to assess personal jurisdiction. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
The City’s administrative approvals were subject to certain conditions, one of which related to the provision of affordable housing units. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm
Regular readers of this blog know my view that the rise of collective investor actions outside the United States is one of the most important developments in the world of directors’ and officers’ liability in recent years. [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:10 pm
The court in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 9:10 am
By Cori Badgley In City of Palmdale v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:40 pm
April 20, 2018) (here), the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, applying New York law, was tasked with interpreting the following “Related Claims” language in a Real Estate Professional Liability Policy: “a series of continuous, repeated or interrelated Wrongful Acts shall be considered as one Wrongful Act. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
Duggar v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
Duggar v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am
Since then, at least in the United States, the general partnership has been largely supplanted by other, statutorily enabled business forms providing limited liability, namely, corporations and, more recently, limited liability companies. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
Finally, no project sponsor or lender reacts well to legal uncertainty, and at present, there is likely no other jurisdiction in the United States or its territories with more legal uncertainty than Puerto Rico. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
She escaped to the United States and sought asylum. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption.” To be exempt from state taxation, the government must reserve some sort of controlling interest in a grant or privilege. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
The court awarded the plaintiff the two properties upon considering a number of factors, including that the real estate was acquired during the marriage; the defendant=s income increased substantially during the marriage, while the plaintiff delayed her own career advancement and remained at home caring for the parties= four children; the businesses, which were marital property and would have been subject to equitable d [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
The court awarded the plaintiff the two properties upon considering a number of factors, including that the real estate was acquired during the marriage; the defendant=s income increased substantially during the marriage, while the plaintiff delayed her own career advancement and remained at home caring for the parties= four children; the businesses, which were marital property and would have been subject to equitable d [read post]
