Search for: "United States v. Choice" Results 361 - 380 of 6,593
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2021, 10:55 am by Jeremy Feigenbaum
Although the challengers in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
Ct. 1614, 1618 (2022) (Barrett, J.); United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 5:27 am by Mark Nevitt
And Azerbaijan, a petrostate heavily reliant on fossil fuel extraction (with a troubled human rights record to boot) was a controversial choice to host any climate summit. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 6:40 am by Gregory B. Williams
’s motion to transfer two patent infringement actions from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware to the United States District Court for the Central District of Delaware where Amgen has a declaratory judgment action pending. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:23 am by Josh Wright
  For example, Commissioner Rosch has argued both that the consumer choice standard is desirable and that, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Leegin, is the law (“injury to consumer choice (as well as an increase in price) is now recognized as injury to consumer welfare in the United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm by VALL Blog Master
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 8:40 am
 Furthermore, another clause in the Purchase Agreement concerning equitable remedies contemplated jurisdiction “in any court of the United States or any state thereof,” but did not demand it in any particular location. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Christopher Brown, Matrix
On 25 February 2015, the Supreme Court handed down its judgments in R (oao Rotherham Metropolitan BC and Ors) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 6. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 3:07 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
 “This case, in particular, presents one of the most egregious examples of an individual flouting the laws against ivory trafficking that has been prosecuted in the United States,” the prosecutor wrote.Attorney Alva argued in a separate memorandum “why [Gordon] is a poor choice for a ‘poster child’ in the ‘war’ againstthe illegal elephantivory trade,” explaining that “Mr. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 3:43 am by Tobias Thienel
United Kingdom, at paras. 135-140, as a procedural immunity, in an error acknowledged by the Court in Z and Others v. [read post]