Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 361 - 380
of 14,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2024, 8:52 pm
United States will require closely-held business owners to reconsider their current buy-sell arrangement in order to avoid additional federal estate tax. [read post]
6 May 2012, 5:34 am
Ed. 2d 85 (1990) (noting those exigent circumstances); United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 12:23 pm
United States, 254 F. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
Under this line of reasoning, anyone selling foreign securities in the United States and closing the transaction in the United States could escape application of the antifraud provisions. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 4:32 am
Accord United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 3:18 am
Finally, Judge Newman questions the following sentences from page 47 of the government’s appellate brief: Given recent acknowledgments by the President and other senior officials of the previously properly classified fact that the United States carried out the targeted strike that killed Anwar al-Awlaki, DOJ has now determined that it can provide some limited additional information about classified documents in its possession that are responsive to the ACLU request. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 5:11 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 12:37 am
Westlake Services, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2016-2001, 09 June 2017 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 9:00 am
United States and GE Energy Power Conversion France v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 11:19 am
I’ll close this post with Justice Thomas’s observation in IRAP v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:01 am
Under the test in Morrison, a transaction involving foreign citizens, foreign companies, and foreign behavior could be brought in the United States if the sale happened to close in the United States. [read post]
Supreme Court Narrowly Upholds 8th Amendment Protection for Mentally-Ill Defendants Facing Execution
28 Jun 2007, 1:52 pm
In a troublingly close 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court of the United States reaffirmed that a mentally ill person is entitled to Eighth Amendment protection if he does not have a rational understanding of the reason for his execution. [read post]
Supreme Court Narrowly Upholds 8th Amendment Protection for Mentally-Ill Defendants Facing Execution
28 Jun 2007, 1:52 pm
In a troublingly close 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court of the United States reaffirmed that a mentally ill person is entitled to Eighth Amendment protection if he does not have a rational understanding of the reason for his execution. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:07 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 11:10 am
Reporters at The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) have been paying close attention to recent developments concerning federal preemption of state lawsuits, concerning United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drugs and medical devices. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 3:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit grants rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 3:28 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 12:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:40 am
Justice Kagan cited Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of the United States v. [read post]
