Search for: "United States v. Cross"
Results 361 - 380
of 7,366
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2022, 4:02 am
Parietti's Predicament And Prosecutors' Puzzling Principles (BrokeAndBroker.com Blog)2Cir Vacates SDNY Jury Verdict Against UBS for Whistleblower RetaliationTrevor Murray, Plaintiff/Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 1:04 pm
Van Colle (administrator of the estate of GC (deceased)) and another (Original-Respondents and Cross-appellants) v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police (Original Appellant and Cross-respondent) Smith (Respondent) v Chief Constable of Sussex Police (Appellant) [2008] UKHL 50 (30 July 2008) Caldarelli (Appellant) v Court of Naples (Respondent) (Criminal Appeal from her Majesty's High Court of Justice) [2008] UKHL 51 (30 July 2008) R (on the… [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 3:05 pm
United States: Whether a federal circuit court may sua sponte increase a defendant's sentence in the absence of a cross-appeal by the government. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:13 am
Lujan v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:13 am
Lujan v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 11:13 pm
Oct. 28, 2010) and United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 5:32 am
In Leser v Berridge,--- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 6811035 (C.A.10 (Colo.)) [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:13 am
The most notable cases from national courts are Subafilms, Ltd. v MGM-Pathe Communications Co., 24 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir. 1994) (United States) and Abkco Music & Records Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 2:10 pm
It is cross examination which serves as the quality control unit in these cases. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
"The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees a defendant the right to be confronted with the witnesses against him [or her]' " (People v Brown, 13 NY3d 332, 338). [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 7:18 am
R (On The Application of Animal Defenders International) V Secretary of State For Culture, Media and Sport (Respondent) [2008] UKHL 15 (12 March 2008) Norris (Appellant) v Judgments - Government of the United States of America and others (Respondent) (Criminal Appeal from Her Majesty's High Court of Justice) [2008] UKHL 16 (12 March 2008) Brit Syndicates Limited for and on behalf of Brit Syndicate 2987 at Lloyd’s for the 2003 year of… [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:11 am
Cross-posted from Cato at Liberty, a guest post from my Cato colleague Andrew Grossman: Enough is enough, the Supreme Court ruled today in Harris v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 11:57 am
Mesa: Whether a formalist or functionalist analysis governs the extraterritorial application of the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unjustified deadly force, as applied to a cross-border shooting of an unarmed Mexican citizen in an enclosed area controlled by the United States; Whether qualified immunity may be granted or denied based on facts – such as the victim’s legal status – unknown to the officer at the time of the incident; and Whether the… [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:01 pm
Last week, AFCCA heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
Read Part I for a quick snapshot of the ins and outs of the zero draft; Part III for a deep dive on Chapter V regarding international cooperation: the historical context, the zero draft's approach, scope of cooperation, and protection of personal data, and Part IV, which deals with the criminalization of security research.The United Nations Headquarters in New York City is poised to become the epicenter of one of the most concerning global debates affecting human rights in the… [read post]
25 Nov 2006, 8:12 am
The Texas Law today travels to the Supreme Court of the United States to investigate the landmark decision of Crawford v. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 3:02 pm
In the case of State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 7:02 am
BNP cross-moved to enjoin arbitration.The court noted that a non-party to an arbitration agreement, such as the Republic, can compel arbitration only where state contract law renders the agreement enforceable at the non-party’s behest. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:35 am
United States v. [read post]
