Search for: "United States v. Dutch"
Results 361 - 380
of 768
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2017, 7:19 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 10:42 am
The Commission explained that there was insufficient evidence to determine whether the United States was violating human rights. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:26 am
Today the Supreme Court is hearing oral argument in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum (and a companion case) – one of the more important and interesting cases involving international law and foreign relations law of the United States in recent years. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 6:46 pm
In particular, it could provide an answer to the various problems that are anticipated to develop in the United States following the recent Supreme Court decisions in Oxford Health Plans LLC v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 11:24 am
United States. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:30 pm
The ICJ Order in South Africa v Israel On 26 January 2024, the ICJ delivered its landmark Order indicating provisional measures in South Africa v Israel. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
The article dissects the legal reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum[1] and argues that the majority simply got it wrong principally by conflating ‘the jurisdictional and cause of action aspects of an ATS suit’. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
Calvin Johnson For the Symposium on Michael Klarman, The Framers' Coup: The Making of the United States Constitution.Michael Klarman’s The Framers’ Coup: The Making of the United States Constitution (Oxford 2016) is an opponent’s history of the adoption of the American Constitution. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 1:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:24 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum (2013) that if a plaintiff wants to hold a defendant liable for human rights violations that occurred in another country under the ATS, the plaintiff must show that the claim “touches and concerns” the United States. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 11:32 pm
International Law, United States' Imperialism and Latin America- Hemispherism, inter-Americanism, and Pan-Americanism- U.S. interventions and imperialism (e.g. the Mexican-American War)- The Monroe Doctrine and the Roosevelt Corollary- Etc.4. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 6:51 am
Help and assistance was offered by many organizations and countries, including the Netherlands, the United States of America, the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, the French Republic and the Kingdom of Belgium. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:35 am
Managing Intellectual Property had a bit of a scoop this week, picking up very quickly on the news that Lord Younger of Leckie, the current Minister for Intellectual Property in the United Kingdom, announced that his government had no plans to introduce an IP Tsar along the lines of the apparently successful Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator in the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 1:09 am
Click here to go to www.nylj.com
United States, respondent-appellant v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:37 am
One of yesterday’s grants was United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
First, the compatibility of United Kingdom corporate taxation with certain principles of EU law and the liabilities of the Revenue to a taxpayer who has overpaid tax on the basis of incompatible United Kingdom legislation. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
* The IPKat weblog and the European Patent Office: some points of clarificationMerpel and you need to talk.* Offering a service is not use in commerce Under Lanham Act, says Federal Circuit Court Blogger and recent guest Kat Marie-Andrée Weiss explains the ruling in David Couture v Playdom, a Federal Circuit's decision that highlights a difference of approach between the trade mark law of the United States and that of the European Union as regards the… [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:41 am
In Nicaragua v. [read post]
