Search for: "United States v. Estes"
Results 361 - 380
of 559
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2022, 1:35 pm
United States, 98 Fed. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:01 am
Referencias Copyright Term and the Public Domain in the United States Public by Sufferance Alone: The Worst of 2012 15 years ago, Congress kept Mickey Mouse out of the public domain. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm
The class spent the entire semester on United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 7:47 am
Los Estados Unidos no están en condiciones de darnos lecciones. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 10:58 am
¿Aún no estás suscrito a Microjuris? [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 11:40 am
Second, is the Supreme Court's opinion and reasoning in United Saving Ass'n v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 5:36 pm
Ius naturale est, quod natura omnia animalia docuit: nam ius istud non humani generis proprium, sed omnium animalium, quae in terra, quae in mari nascuntur, avium quoque commune est. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 11:10 pm
Now we know, it’s a myth (IPKat) United States US General Are you small, American, IP-ish and in business? [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 8:57 pm
Legal Reasoning (Bryson, O'Malley)Legal Standard for Public Use§ 102(b)'s public useAn applicant may not receive a patent for an invention that was “in public use . . . in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:13 am
Mattis, United States Central Command Commander, said in a statement. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 4:30 pm
Register for Free Decisions this Week United StatesIndex Newspapers v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
The trial in the case of Turley v Unite the Union concluded before Nicklin J on 19 November 2019. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:33 pm
But that provides a weapon to the great enemy of the Cuban state--the Americans. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Slip Op. 06460 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state (see Opportune N. v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:06 am
The federal judge to whom the case was assigned began his analysis of this issue by noting that a “challenge to a statute on First Amendment grounds requires that I first consider whether the speech . . . is protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
With distressing frequency, especially in capital cases such as this, federal judges refuse to be governed by Congress’s command that state criminal judgments must not be revised by federal courts unless they are “contrary to, or involv[e] an unreasonable application of, clearly estab- lished Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States,” 28 U. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 4:45 am
He was tracked in Germany by his phone company, and he sued to get his own records to see how minutely his movements could be tracked.In much the same manner, Hughes explained, law enforcement in Texas and across the United States is using call-tracking information in investigations. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 4:25 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 12:37 pm
The essay is also important for an important judiciary noticeable by its absence--that of the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:27 am
United States Department of Health and Human Services. [read post]
