Search for: "United States v. Goodwill"
Results 361 - 380
of 484
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2010, 6:13 pm
IBWA is a nonprofit whose members are bottled water producers, distributors, and suppliers in the United States and abroad. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:28 pm
United States [U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 5:01 pm
See Groupon, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:23 am
V. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 12:48 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 9:02 am
Respondent provided a short response to the Complaint which states in full as follows: Cybersquatting (also known as domain squatting), according to the United States federal law known as the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, is registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name with bad faith intent to profit from the goodwill of a trademark belonging to someone else. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:36 pm
Rehnquist in Herrera v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:54 am
People’s United Bank v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm
The European Convention on Human Rights 1950 art.6(1) applied in all its force, and it followed from the reasoning of the Strasbourg Court in A v United Kingdom (2009) 49 EHRR as interpreted by the House of Lords in Secretary of State for the Home Department v F (2009) UKHL 28, (2009) 3 WLR 74 that the Treasury was obliged to afford the claimant bank sufficient disclosure to enable it to give effective instructions about the essential allegations made against it. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:07 am
UIM claims that its largest source of revenue comes from customers in France since U.S. law prevents UIM from generating gaming revenue in the United States through the Internet or telephone [ed. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
Litella's catchphrase when I read the Appellate Division, Second Department's important decision last week affirming the trial court's key stock valuation rulings, in Matter of Murphy (United States Dredging Corp.), 2010 NY Slip Op 04794 (2d Dept June 1, 2010). [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:27 am
The Southern District's decision was later affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Nordwind v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:20 am
SE C.V. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 7:42 am
--Court: United States District Court for the District of ArizonaOpinion Date: 4/6/10Cite: Zep, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:28 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 11:02 am
--Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitOpinion Date: 3/24/10Cite: Mohr v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 6:52 pm
And SBM has not shown that it has used the mark in the United States at all. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 2:15 am
Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
– EIPR article (PatLit) United States US Patent Reform Dr. [read post]
