Search for: "United States v. Hinders" Results 361 - 380 of 677
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2022, 6:16 am by Brad Carney, Olivia B. Hoff
Deterring strategic attacks against the United States, allies, and partners. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 11:10 am by Susan Brenner
 Section 1512(b)(3) makes it a federal crime to “hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense”. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:43 am by Caroline Mala Corbin
In the past few years, those without religious belief, whether they consider themselves atheist, agnostic, humanist, secular, or freethinker, have become much more prominent in the United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 9:08 am by Dr Christy Shucksmith
Humanitarianism v. the State: Migration as an issue of national security or human security. [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:33 pm
The Court noticed this in Texas Monthly v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:34 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
That's the part of the Bankruptcy Code that makes your phone stop ringing and lawsuits stop coming when you file a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy in Arizona.It's a pretty complicated piece of legislation, and it's fundamentally different from the versions of stays which existed under the Bankruptcy Act (the version of the bankruptcy law that we had in the United States prior to what bankruptcy lawyers called the New Code prior to the 2005 Amendments. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by León Castellanos-Jankiewicz
United States, where the Supreme Court construed a federal statute criminalizing possession of a firearm in the United States by “any person…who has been convicted in any court. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:30 pm by Guest Blogger
  Since 2008, numerous personhood initiatives have sprung up throughout the United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Caroline Hackley
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:06 am by Susan Brenner
The federal judge to whom the case was assigned began his analysis of this issue by noting that a “challenge to a statute on First Amendment grounds requires that I first consider whether the speech . . . is protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:44 am by Jonathan Bailey
However, in the United States, that wasn’t always true. [read post]